|
li
<br />4' ? ? ? _.
<br />?? F i ? ? i
<br />r??t ate ? ???r??? o tie Zt?.a? ??
<br />i?
<br />'??? ? ??" ? , ? r ?. ? . ? ' Re???inaa??on anc? n?or?earieta? ? . ? ' ?.: ? ? ' ? ? ; ?? ? - ,' ?`' ??
<br />.i ? ? ? P. ?. Box 4???7
<br />,.
<br />' ? Deaver, ?olara?i? ?0?(? ? ??db?
<br />• ? j? REPLY ??FER TD: ? S
<br />Lo1•etta Fineda, Actiaa? Dire?ta?r ? ? ? ?? ? . ? . ? • ? . ? .
<br />D?vlsron o?eClanlatxon,lViix?zng and a?`ety ? ? ? . ? ? ? . ? i . ? '? .?
<br />? 3 ? 3 Iler?ar? street, o o?n ? 1 ?
<br />Denve?•, O Sa??? ? ? ..
<br />• R?: Bond release ,pI??ation. o. ? ?5??5}, Phase ? ICI Band release ?.t the. oa.dside ? ? .. .
<br />. Far?a?s, Fear?.itNa,???9????4?, Fxopase Decision and Findings off` compliance
<br />?' letter a?l?.o??edges the ??c a?' luface dining eclan?atian and ?nfarcen?ent ?Q?,
<br />. Western ?e ion ?'?},Denver Fiend D?v?sion`s ???}receipt and x•evie ofthe above F?•apQSed ? .
<br />i Decision. aid Findings of ona?Iiance document pxepaa'ed b?? .e Division o??eclaatian,? ,
<br />Ong and a?`et?T ??D?? dated eptenaber ?, ?OD9.? DAD agrees with e dings and . ? . • ? .
<br />. decision document and hereb?? ?xovides ? cancua•arence ?oa• the above bind xelease ?BR}
<br />coon in accoxda?ce with D CFA 74?. ???d}?3}, and 3a MFR 90?,3D, A1?icle ect?o? 4 and . .
<br />. ?5, o?the alorado state-Federal o?pexatxve ?gae?naeaat.
<br />?. thorough surnmaa of ? i#e's hitax?, pro?iau fond release action, a?,d ??eciamat?an .taar?
<br />at the mine are accurate?? capt?ued i?a the above ?]?? Paaposed Decision; Public and ? .. ? ? ?• .
<br />. landowner no?.?ca?aaas o? the board release applications mere provided #o ? N.? by ?. 'the _
<br />inspection notcations pzo??ided ??? ??,the DDS's inspec.an findings fax the ?,? and . ? ..
<br />related car??esponde?ce are all documented in the F?ioposd Decision, ?, the Bureau off' ?,?d
<br />?. lVlanager??ent ?BLIV?}, and all affected landoners eye notified o?'the B inspection. ? ? .
<br />The ?? scheduled and conducted its ? ass ection an ???? ? 4, ????. l1?lil?e?Bvtaxa? ?DI??,
<br />Dana at?hes ?DVI?, ?'on?a ?a??ur?ond ?a?o?rcap aai onapaaa?}, ?'a?a' stover {?,?tover .
<br />- Associates, at?d ?hrit?.?e Bella ??Nl} pa?-?icipated an the inspection.
<br />The BLNI adm??ster the coal lease, but no# the s?u•?ace hands at ?aadside? Fo?? this ??ea?on, the -
<br />?? declined to p?•ovide input in tiles ?? actio?? TJ? did not ?•ece??e a?,? objections, ? ? ? .
<br />oo?nments, or ?•e?uests ?a?• an za?`oara? co?a?'e?•eaace regaa•dg this ?? Tlxe D? F?•oposed ? .
<br />Decision documents the site's compliance itl? the olorada appxoved ?ieulato p?'o??a?x? at
<br />?u1e 3.a?,2, yule ?, l?:i o, axad DDS's bond release guidelines dated April, l ?, x 995. The bond
<br />release c??i#eria o? yule 4. ? ? f ? a leave been net in accpxdance ??,th tl?e appl•o??ed industrial post
<br />ping land use .
<br />?? ???
<br />??? f
|