My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-10-29_REVISION - C1982056 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2009-10-29_REVISION - C1982056 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:56:35 PM
Creation date
10/30/2009 10:28:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/29/2009
Doc Name
Attached Table & Supporting Drawdown Calculations Responding to DRMS Adequacy Comments (Email)
From
Jerry Nettleton
To
Tom Kaldenbach
Type & Sequence
PR8
Email Name
JHB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 1. <br />Calculated Drawdown Versus Time in Twentymile Sandstone Aquifer <br />at Gertie #1 and Livestock #2 Springs. <br />t Drawdown in Springs Areas(ft) <br />, years Gertie #1 Sp. Livestock #2 Sp. <br />10 0.0 0.0 <br />30 0.0 0.0 <br />50 0.0 0.0 <br />70 0.1 0.0 <br />90 2.5 0.0 <br />100 6.7 0.0 <br />110 13.9 0.1 <br />120 24.5 0.4 <br />140 55.5 2.4 <br />160 96.2 8.1 <br />180 142.3 19.0 <br />200 190.2 35.5 <br />Because the Twentymile Sandstone is separated from the Wadge Coal Seam by 670 feet <br />of low-permeability, primarily marine shale overburden, and because subsidence-related <br />fracturing of overburden rocks is unlikely to extend more than about 200 feet upward <br />from the mined part of the Wadge Coal, there is little potential for hydrologic connection <br />between the mine and the Twentymile Sandstone. Additionally, it is unlikely that faulting <br />would provide a hydrologic connection between the mine and the Twentymile Sandstone.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.