My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-10-23_PERMIT FILE - M2009076 (19)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2009076
>
2009-10-23_PERMIT FILE - M2009076 (19)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:56:26 PM
Creation date
10/27/2009 7:22:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009076
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
10/23/2009
Doc Name
Appl. Items Corrected & Resubmitted
From
Venture Resources, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
ACS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
R7 <br />Permit Compliance Limits. Based on Historic & Current Big 5 Tunnel Discharge* <br />Metal Limit <br />(micrograms/liter) Limit, m <br />(milligrams/liter) Justification <br />Arsenic, As 10 0.01 Historic Big 5 <br />Barium, Ba 2000 ??? 2 Domestic Water Std. <br />Cadmium, Cd 48 0.048 Historic Big 5 <br />Chromium, Cr 100 0.1 Domestic Water Std. <br />Copper, Cu 2960 2.96 Historic Big 5 <br />Lead, Pb 91 0.091 Historic Big 5 <br />Manganese, Mn 32,200 32.2 Historic Big 5 <br />Mercury, Hg 2 0.002 Domestic Water Std. <br />Selenium, Se 50 0.05 Domestic Water Std. <br />Silver, Ag 50 0.05 Domestic Water Std. <br />Zinc, Zn 9770 9.77 Historic Big 5 <br />*Note: It is necessary to apply a dilution factor of 1:3 to lab analysis of pilot plant samples in order to correlate the <br />data to proposed Mobile Mill operations. Refer to the explanation in the attached Waste Stream Characterization. <br />See 6.3.3(2)(b) for a detailed explanation of Points of Compliance. <br />6.4.20(10)(a)(i) <br />There are no Designated Chemicals to be used in this operation. Refer to Exhibit C, 6.3.3(2)(a) for a list of non- <br />designated chemicals to be used. There is also a complete collection of MSDS for these chemicals at the end of <br />Exhibit C. <br />There are no extractive metallurgical processes proposed as part of this operation, only gravity and flotation <br />concentration methods. <br />6.4.20(10)(a)(ii) <br />The stormwater management design has been performed by a CO licensed professional engineer. See this design in <br />Exhibit C and Exhibit E. <br />6.4.20(10)(a)(iii) <br />The stormwater management design has been performed by a CO licensed professional engineer. See this design in <br />Exhibit C and Exhibit E. <br />A Colorado Discharge Permit is not required because there is zero process water discharge to surface waters and the <br />process water is nearly 100% recycled back to the mill. <br />6.4.20(10)(b) <br />The stormwater management design has been performed by a CO licensed professional engineer. See this design in <br />Exhibit C and Exhibit E. <br />6.4.20(11)(a) <br />Clear Creek is located 2,800' to the south and 1,000' in elevation below the Tailings Impoundment affected area. <br />Drainage from this area follows down Hukill Gulch. Historically, the drainage from this vicinity contains acid- <br />runoff/drainage from the numerous abandoned mine waste rock piles and adits located throughout this normally dry <br />gulch. Many of these sources are not within the control of Venture Resources (ie Colorado School of Mines owns <br />over a dozen properties downgradient in this vicinity; one of which, the Edgar Union Lode, contains three large <br />dumps that is 350' downgrade from the proposed Tailings Impoundment). <br />A Colorado Discharge Permit is not required because there is zero process water discharge to surface waters and the <br />process water is nearly 100% recycled back to the mill. <br />However, DRMS has requested surface water quality data and analysis. <br />22
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.