My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-10-23_INSPECTION - M2002004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2009-10-23_INSPECTION - M2002004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:56:25 PM
Creation date
10/26/2009 7:39:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
10/23/2009
Doc Name
Insp Rpt
From
DRMS
To
GCC Rio Grande
Inspection Date
9/29/2009
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: m-9nn9-n04 <br />INSPECTION DATE: 9.199109 INSPECTORS INITIALS: _ RK <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />The Division conducted a monitoring inspection of the site on 9/29/09. The main purpose <br />of the inspection was to sit down with the operator and go over the numeric protection <br />levels the Division wants to set for the operation. The site is a very large 2500 acre <br />lime stone mining operation with a cement plant. The maximum affected acre for the site <br />is 895. <br />Present during the meeting was Mr. Brian McGill of GCC. Discussed the number of <br />parameters the Division wants to set for the site. Operator had been collecting GW water <br />data for the site from the shallow alluvium since late 2007. DRMS had requested an <br />additional well to be drilled between the mine plant operation and the St Charles River. <br />The well was drilled in 2008, but was found to be dry and no data was collected. <br />During the meeting on 9/29/09. DRMS indicated to the operator that all the shallow <br />alluvium wells will utilized as compliance wells and suggested the following parameters <br />based on the data collected so far. <br />Baseline dat collected so far indicate Radiochemistry for gross alpha exceed the Colorado <br />groundwater standard of 15 pico Curies/Liter in wells MW002, MW003, MW004, AND DUPO-01, <br />both in the 2008 data and the August 28, 2008 data. <br />The source appears to be the natural ground results rather than from ay kind of activity <br />associated with the operation. Normally such elevated radionuclide activities in Colorado <br />aquifers are more or less associated with leaching from granitic bedrock masses, that <br />underlay many aquifers in the state. Mr. McGill was informed that DRMS based on the data <br />provided would like monitoring on a semiannual basis and the results to be submitted <br />annually for Radium 226 and 228, sulfate and TDS. The proposal is to either <br />utilize the mean and 1 standard deviation above the mean or use the highest reading <br />recorded for each parameter and use that as a trend setter. Mr. McGill stated that he <br />will run the proposal to the higher ups in Mexico and get back to DRMS no later than <br />10/31/09. Mr. McGill stated that he will be getting back to DRMS with by the end of the <br />month. <br />DRMS also pointed out the fact that GCC, to date had not submitted the Technical Revision <br />addressing the water treatment facility and as built drawings for the facility in place <br />so the appropriate financial warranty can be calculated. Mr. McGill apologized and said <br />the delay was not from him but his higher ups in Mexico and will push to get the TR in <br />place that will include all the information requested in the Inspection report dated <br />1/24/08 and page three of this inspection report. The Division strongly recommends <br />the operator to submit the information requested by the date indicated or <br />sooner. <br />After the meeting a brief site visit was conducted. The clinker operation was down but <br />fine cement was being processed at the time of the inspection. Looked at the pit area, it <br />was active. High walls stable. The overall limestone pit area did not appear to have <br />significantly increased since the last inspection in 2008. <br />In anticipation of the expansion of the pit, top soil was being removed along the west <br />side of the existing pit. Top soil was being stockpiled along the north side of the pit <br />to be moved into a permanent location until need for reclamation. <br />Looked as the cemet fine production which was active at the time of the inspection. Mr <br />McGill mentioned the fact that the water treatment plant that was to be included in the <br />pending TR might never be operational and more than likely be never be utilized. Even if <br />that is the case since the structure is in place it will have to be included in the TR <br />for financial warranty calculation purposes. Permit sign properly posted at the access to <br />the property.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.