My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-10-16_REVISION - M1977036 (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977036
>
2009-10-16_REVISION - M1977036 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:20:35 PM
Creation date
10/22/2009 7:47:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977036
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/16/2009
Doc Name
First Response to Adequacy Review #1 Comments
From
Tetra Tech
To
Weld County
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TETRA TECH <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />Mr. Jared Ebert <br />October 16, 2009 <br />15. On page 3 of the Groundwater Modeling and Mitigation Plan (Attachment G-1), it <br />states that existing ground level measurements were provided from the 14 monitoring <br />wells. This information was not submitted, please submit this information. <br />We have added this information. It is summarized on Table 1 of Attachment G-1. <br />16. On page 3 of the Groundwater Modeling and Mitigation Plan (Attachment G-1), it <br />states that monitoring will be conducted on a monthly to bi-monthly basis until a <br />quasi steady state is reached and then on a quarterly basis thereafter. Please commit <br />to taking monthly measurements and submitting them in the Annual Reclamation <br />Report submitted by the operator. Once Lafarge believes a steady condition is <br />reached, they will need to submit a Technical Revision to the Division and receive <br />Division approval prior to changing the monitoring schedule from monthly, to bi- <br />monthly and then to quarterly. <br />We have modified Attachment G-1 as requested and made note of the Technical <br />Revision requirement. <br />17. Please explain what will occur if the two foot drawdown trigger point is observed. <br />The mitigation plan submitted accounts for what will occur if Lafarge receives a <br />complaint but does not address what will occur if the two foot trigger point is <br />reached. <br />The language in Attachment G-1 has been modified to better explain what will <br />happen; please see updated Attachment G-1. <br />18. If Lafarge receives a complaint from a water user, they will need to notify the <br />Division immediately, not within two weeks. This notice should include a copy of <br />the complaint (if written), a narrative describing how the situation is being evaluated <br />and what temporary mitigation measure they have implemented. <br />Lafarge agrees to notify the Division within 24 hours; we have modified the language <br />in the revised Attachment G-1. <br />19. On page 4 of the Groundwater Modeling and Mitigation Plan (Attachment G-1), it <br />states "Lafarge has no responsibility to provide mitigation for wells that are <br />constructed after the permit is approved." This is not correct, in accordance with rule <br />3.1.6 (1) the operator is required to minimize disturbances to the prevailing <br />hydrologic balance of the affected land and of the surrounding area and to the <br />quantity or quality of water in surface and groundwater systems both during and after <br />mining operations and during reclamation. Given this, if the mining and reclamation <br />operation impacts the ability of surrounding land owners to legally use groundwater, <br />Lafarge will be responsible for mitigating these disturbances. Please remove this <br />statement for the Groundwater Modeling and Mitigation Plan (Attachment G-1) and <br />submit a new copy. <br />This statement has been removed from the attached, updated version of Attachment <br />G-1.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.