Laserfiche WebLink
Water Quality Impacts <br />The operator submits a surface and groundwater report to the Division annually. The Division's <br />review of the annual hydrology reports concludes that the areas under consideration for bond release <br />are not contributing suspended solids to streamflow or runoff outside the permit area in excess of <br />premining conditions. Sediment pond No. 2 and the dugout pond at the Keenesburg Strip Mine <br />have not discharged in many years. Both sediment pond No. 2 and the dugout pond were <br />previously approved to remain as permanent structures (TR32 and TR28). The Division determined <br />during previous Phase II bond release reviews that runoff from the bond release areas were not <br />contributing additional suspended solids outside of the permit area. <br />The Division finds that there have been no adverse effects to groundwater down gradient of the <br />permit area. The Division concluded the Keenesburg Mine does not have the potential to <br />negatively impact ground water and has not required establishment of a groundwater point of <br />compliance (Memo to 2004 AHR file, dated July 6, 2005). If coal spoil leachate or ash leachate <br />migrated from the pit through eolian sand, Ennis alluvium or the Laramie sandstone, coal <br />attenuation and dispersion would result in levels of total dissolved solids (TDS) and sodium <br />adsorption ratio (SAR) in ground water that would be near pre-mining conditions within a few <br />hundred feet of the Keenesburg Mine pits. Monitoring of groundwater quality in the down <br />gradient wells from the reclaimed pits found the 2008 TDS values were well below the pre- <br />mining levels. The Probable Hydrologic Consequences section of the permit application predicts <br />no appreciable impacts to the hydrologic balance. Monitoring data in the hydrology reports <br />confirm this prediction. No impacts to groundwater have been found in down gradient <br />groundwater monitoring wells. Based upon this information, the Division finds that with regard <br />to bond release application SL4, pollution of surface water and subsurface water is not occurring <br />and the probability of such pollution occurring is low. <br />Surety Reduction (SRI) <br />The Division determined the reclamation liability for the Keenesburg Mine prior to this bond <br />release application at $2,327,437.00 (Permit Renewal No. 5). The Division updated some of its <br />equipment costs in August 2009. Update of the reclamation liability costs on September 28, 2009 <br />using the updated equipment costs changed the cost to complete remaining reclamation work at the <br />Keenesburg Strip Mine prior approval for SL4 to $2,289,771.00. The Division thus holds an excess <br />of $37,666.00 in liability bond over the amount required to be held by the Division for remaining <br />reclamation and maintenance on the Keenesburg Strip Mine. The Division proposes, with SR1 <br />(Surety Reduction No. 1), to reduce the reclamation liability by $37,666.00 based upon this current <br />reclamation cost estimate. (Rule 3.02.2(4)) <br />Coors Energy Company was notified on October 13, 2009 of the proposed surety reduction. In <br />accordance with Rule 3.02.2(4)(a), CEC was provided the opportunity to request an informal <br />conference regarding the surety reduction. On October 15, 2009, CEC responded via electronic <br />mail that they did not want an informal conference. <br />C1981-028, SL4 9 10/19/2009