My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-10-16_PERMIT FILE - M2009082 (27)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2009082
>
2009-10-16_PERMIT FILE - M2009082 (27)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:56:14 PM
Creation date
10/20/2009 9:21:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009082
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
10/16/2009
Doc Name
Stability Analysis
From
Lafarge West, Inc.
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Phase 4B <br />The depth to bedrock in this area is greatest near the western portion of the mining cell. Therefore a <br />worst case scenario is represented near the western portion of the mining highwall of this phase. The <br />soil profile analyzed was based on a conglomeration of soil information from exploration locations <br />PA04-BH02, PA04-BH09 and PA04-BH11. The model analyzed; a soil overburden that was 5 feet <br />thick, a sand and gravel layer that was 10 feet thick, and a total pit depth of 15 feet. The highest <br />groundwater monitored in the area was in MW-8 approximately 8 feet below the ground surface. <br />No stockpiles are currently planned to be next to this mining cell. No flood irrigation is near this mining <br />cell; therefore the piezometric surface was based on the site monitoring. <br />Phase 4C <br />The depth to bedrock in this area is greatest near the eastern portion of the mining cell. Therefore a <br />worst case scenario is represented near the eastern portion of the mining highwall of this phase. The soil <br />profile analyzed was based on a conglomeration of soil information from exploration locations PA04- <br />BH10, PA04-BH11, MW-7 and MW-12. The model analyzed; a soil overburden that was 5 feet thick, a <br />sand and gravel layer that was 8 feet thick, and a total pit depth of 13 feet. The highest groundwater <br />monitored in the area was in MW-7 approximately 8 feet below the ground surface. <br />An overburden stockpile was placed east of the pit. No flood irrigation is near this mining cell; <br />therefore the piezometric surface was based on the site monitoring. <br />Phase 5A <br />The depth to bedrock in this area is greatest near the western portion of the mining cell. Therefore a <br />worst case scenario is represented near the western portion of the mining highwall of this phase. The <br />soil profile analyzed was based on a conglomeration of soil information from exploration locations <br />MW-9 and MW-10. The model analyzed; a soil overburden that was 4 feet thick, a sand and gravel <br />layer that was 10 feet thick, and a total pit depth of 14 feet. The highest groundwater monitored in the <br />area was in MW-10 approximately 8 feet below the ground surface. <br />No stockpiles are currently planned to be next to this mining cell. No flood irrigation is near this mining <br />cell; therefore the piezometric surface was based on the site monitoring. <br />Parsons Mine <br />DRMS 112 Permit <br />Page SES of SE8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.