Laserfiche WebLink
#TMA <br />TABLES, MEMORANDA, ATTACHMENTS <br />#RS <br />UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY <br />0 FINAL <br />RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY <br />OPERABLE UNIT NO. TWO OF THE <br />CLEAR CREEK/CENTRAL CITY SUPERFUND SITE <br />CLEAR CREEK AND GILPIN COUNTIES, COLORADO <br />MARCH 1988 <br />THIS RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY FOR OPERABLE UNIT NO. TWO OF THE CLEAR CREEK/CENTRAL CITY SITE WAS <br />PREPARED BY THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA) TO DESCRIBE THE ISSUES RAISED BY <br />RESIDENTS OF CLEAR CREEK AND GILPIN COUNTIES, THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, AND OTHER <br />INTERESTED PARTIES REGARDING EPA'S ACTIVITIES IN THE AREA AND TO SUMMARIZE EPA'S RESPONSES TO <br />THOSE ISSUES. EPA IS CONDUCTING A REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION AND FEASIBILITY STUDY (RI/FS) AT THE <br />SITE TO DETERMINE THE NATURE AND EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION THAT HAS RESULTED FROM HISTORIC MINING <br />ACTIVITIES IN THE AREA, TO DEVELOP WAYS OF REMEDIATING THE CONTAMINATION FOUND AT THE SITE, AND, <br />FINALLY, TO SELECT THE MOST APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTIONS. <br />A RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY IS REQUIRED UNDER THE COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, <br />COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY ACT (CERCLA) OF 1980 (THE "SUPERFUND" PROGRAM) AS AMENDED BY THE <br />SUPERFUND AMENDMENTS AND REAUTHORIZATION ACT (SARA) OF 1986. THE PURPOSE OF THE RESPONSIVENESS <br />SUMMARY IS TO DOCUMENT PUBLIC CONCERNS ABOUT PROPOSED REMEDIAL ACTIONS AND TO PRESENT EPA'S <br />PONSES TO THOSE CONCERNS. THIS DOCUMENT SUMMARIZES PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR THE PERIOD THAT BEGAN <br />PH THE INITIATION OF THE FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) FOR OPERABLE UNIT NO. TWO.IN JUNE 1987 <br />CONTINUING THROUGH THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD ON THE OPERABLE UNIT NO. TWO FS REPORT. THE PUBLIC <br />COMMENT PERIOD CLOSED ON DECEMBER 18, 1987; HOWEVER, EPA ACCEPTED COMMENTS THROUGH MARCH 1988. <br />THIS REPORT IS DIVIDED INTO THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS: <br />SECTION I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND. THIS SECTION PROVIDES A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO <br />THE SITE AND DESCRIBES EPA'S PREFERRED ALTERNATIVES FOR REMEDIAL ACTION ON <br />OPERABLE UNIT NO. TWO. <br />SECTION II. THE COMMUNITY RELATIONS PROGRAM AT THE CLEAR CREEK/CENTRAL CITY SITE. THIS <br />SECTION PROVIDES A BRIEF HISTORY OF COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES THAT <br />EPA HAS CONDUCTED THROUGHOUT THE RI/FS AT THE SITE. <br />SECTION III. SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED AND EPA'S RESPONSES. THIS SECTION <br />SUMMARIZES COMMENTS RECEIVED BY EPA ON OPERABLE UNIT NO. TWO, CATEGORIZED <br />AS FOLLOWS: <br />- COMMENTS AND EPA'S RESPONSES. COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM INCEPTION OF THE <br />OPERABLE UNIT NO. TWO FS UNTIL THE SELECTION OF REMEDY WAS MADE (IN MARCH <br />1988) AND EPA'S RESPONSES TO THOSE COMMENTS; AND <br />- REMAINING COMMENTS. COMMENTS RECEIVED FOR WHICH EPA WILL PROVIDE MORE <br />COMPLETE ANSWERS AFTER FURTHER STUDY. <br />APPENDIX. CHRONOLOGY OF COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES AT THE CLEAR CREEK/CENTRAL <br />CITY SITE. <br />1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND <br />ICE FEBRUARY 1985, EPA HAS BEEN INVESTIGATING PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS POSED BY <br />MINING WASTES AT THE CLEAR CREEK/CENTRAL CITY SITE. THE MINING WASTES ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE <br />ARGO TUNNEL AND BIG FIVE PORTAL ON CLEAR CREEK AND THE NATIONAL TUNNEL, GREGORY INCLINE AND <br />QUARTZ HILL TUNNEL IN THE NORTH CLEAR CREEK DRAINAGE. THESE INVESTIGATIONS ARE PART OF THE <br />RI/FS AT THE CLEAR CREEK/CENTRAL CITY SUPERFUND SITE IN GILPIN AND CLEAR CREEK COUNTIES. THERE