Laserfiche WebLink
THE THIRD AND FOURTH EXPOSURE PATHWAYS OF CONCERN ARE INGESTION AND DUST INHALATION. AS <br />PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED, ACCEPTABLE RISKS ARE PRESENT FOR TOURISTS AND THE OCCASIONAL SITE VISITORS <br />(EPISODIC EXPOSURE), THEREFORE, NO REMEDIAL ACTIONS ARE CURRENTLY RECOMMENDED TO ALLEVIATE <br />INGESTION AND DUST INHALATION. HOWEVER, THE PUBLIC HEALTH EVALUATION FOR THE SITE INDICATED <br />T, FOR A RESIDENTIAL SCENARIO, RISKS RESULTING FROM THE INHALATION AND INGESTION EXPOSURE <br />HWAYS ARE OF SOME CONCERN. THEREFORE, EPA WILL EVALUATE THIS NO ACTION DECISION WHEN THE <br />FINAL REMEDY IS SELECTED FOR THE SITE. EPA, IN COORDINATION WITH THE STATE OF COLORADO AND <br />LOCAL OFFICIALS, WILL EVALUATE THE USE OF INSTITUTIONAL MEASURES WHICH WOULD CONTROL ANY HUMAN <br />HEALTH OR ENVIRONMENTAL THREAT THAT COULD BE CREATED BY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT UPON THESE TAILINGS <br />AND WASTE ROCK PILES AND ANY OTHER PILES WHICH THE STATE IDENTIFIES IN ITS STUDY. IN ADDITION, <br />PURSUANT TO SARA SECTION 121 (C), EPA WILL REVIEW NO LESS THAN EVERY FIVE YEARS ALL PROPERTIES <br />WHERE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES CONTINUE TO REMAIN ONSITE AND, IF NECESSARY, WILL RECONSIDER THIS NO <br />ACTION DECISION. <br />DOCUMENTATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES <br />EPA IDENTIFIED THE SLOPE STABILIZATION AND RUNON CONTROL ALTERNATIVE AS THE PREFERRED <br />ALTERNATIVE IN THE PROPOSED PLAN WHICH WAS RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC ON NOVEMBER 9, 1987. THE KEY <br />ELEMENTS OF THIS ALTERNATIVE AS STATED IN THE PROPOSED PLAN WERE RUNON CONTROL ON ALL FIVE <br />TAILINGS AND WASTE ROCK PILES AND SLOPE STABILIZATION OF THE BIG FIVE AND THE GREGORY INCLINE. <br />AT THE TIME OF THE RELEASE OF THE PROPOSED PLAN, EPA WAS PROPOSING TO REMOVE THE GABION-BASKET <br />WALL AT THE GREGORY INCLINE AND REPLACE IT WITH A CRIB WALL. EPA INTENDED TO TAKE THE PROPERTY <br />OWNER'S DESIRE TO REPROCESS TAILINGS AT THE GREGORY INCLINE INTO ACCOUNT WHEN REPLACING THE <br />GABION-BASKET WALL. SINCE THAT TIME, EPA HAS RECEIVED EXTENSIVE COMMENT ON THIS PORTION OF THE <br />PROPOSED PLAN AND HAS MODIFIED THE SELECTED REMEDY TO ADDRESS THESE CONCERNS. THE PRIMARY <br />DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PREFERRED REMEDY AS PRESENTED IN THE PROPOSED PLAN AND THE SELECTED <br />REMEDY AS PRESENTED IN THIS RECORD OF DECISION IS THAT EPA NO LONGER PLANS TO IMMEDIATELY <br />REPLACE THE GABION-BASKET WALL, BUT WILL INSTEAD MAINTAIN THE WALL UNTIL MONITORING INDICATES <br />THAT THE WALL NEEDS TO BE REPLACED OR UNTIL THE TAILINGS ARE REMOVED FOR REPROCESSING. THE EPA <br />L STILL TAKE THE OWNER'S REPROCESSING CONCERNS INTO ACCOUNT WHILE MONITORING AND MAINTAINING <br />WALL. <br />THE SELECTED REMEDY IS A LOGICAL OUTGROWTH OF THE REMEDY IDENTIFIED IN THE PROPOSED PLAN AND <br />OTHER ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPED AND EVALUATED IN THE OPERABLE UNIT NO. TWO FS. THE COMPONENTS OF <br />THE SELECTED REMEDY WERE CONCEPTUALLY EVALUATED IN THE FS AND THE SELECTED REMEDY IS WELL WITHIN <br />THE RANGE OF ALTERNATIVES THE PUBLIC COULD HAVE REASONABLY ANTICIPATED EPA TO BE CONSIDERING. <br />#OEL <br />STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS <br />PROTECTIVENESS: <br />THE PUBLIC HEALTH EVALUATION FOR THE CLEAR CREEK/CENTRAL CITY SUPERFUND SITE CLEARLY SHOWS THAT <br />CLEAR CREEK AND NORTH CLEAR CREEK ARE BEING IMPACTED BY THE ACID MINE DISCHARGES AND THE <br />TAILINGS AND WASTE ROCK PILES WHICH ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SITE. THESE IMPACTS INCLUDE: <br />- DEGRADATION OF DOWNSTREAM SURFACE WATER QUALITY RESULTING FROM DISSOLVED AND SUSPENDED <br />METALS IN THE DISCHARGES AND RESUSPENDED METAL LADEN SEDIMENTS BELOW THE DISCHARGES; <br />- DEGRADATION OF DOWNSTREAM SURFACE WATER QUALITY DUE TO POTENTIAL COLLAPSE OF THE <br />TAILINGS AND WASTE ROCK PILES INTO EITHER CLEAR CREEK OR NORTH CLEAR CREEK; AND <br />- DEGRADATION OF DOWNSTREAM SURFACE WATER QUALITY DUE TO RUNON AND RUNOFF FROM THE <br />TAILINGS AND WASTE ROCK PILES. <br />THESE IMPACTS POSE NO IMMEDIATE DANGER TO PUBLIC HEALTH BECAUSE THE CITIES OF IDAHO SPRINGS, <br />CKHAWK, CENTRAL CITY, AND GOLDEN HAVE MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS THAT MEET MCLS. <br />EVER, THESE IMPACTS RESULT IN SEVERELY DEGRADED WATER QUALITY AFFECTING AQUATIC LIFE AND <br />PRODUCTIVITY AND REDUCED OR DESTROYED AQUATIC HABITAT IN CLEAR CREEK AND NORTH CLEAR CREEK. <br />THE FIRST IMPACT MENTIONED ABOVE IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ACID MINE DISCHARGES AND WAS ADDRESSED <br />UNDER OPERABLE UNIT NO. ONE. THE OTHER TWO IMPACTS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE TAILINGS AND WASTE