2009-06-24_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (3)

Home Browse Search

testing the weighted average approach (Rule 4.15.7 (4) (b)) will be utilized where reference area data and revegetated area data are "weighted" (each combined into single values for comparison) based on the proportional acreage of pre-mine communities within the disturbance area footprint. Testing will then follow procedures detailed under Rule 4.15.11 (2) with preference being given first to subsection (a) [direct comparison], second to subsection (c) [reverse-null testing], and third subsection (b) [classic t-test]. For areas designated as Post-2008 sagebrush steppe revegetation (rangeland land use subcomponent of wildlife habitat), herbaceous production success criteria will be eliminated as a requirement should CDRMS rules change as expected in the near future. In the meantime, for Post-2008 sagebrush steppe revegetation, herbaceous production of the revegetated area will be considered adequate for final bond release if it is not less than 70% of the herbaceous production as determined from the reference areas with a 90% statistical confidence utilizing a standard students statistical t-test comparison of the means. If necessary, a reverse-null hypothesis testing procedure may be utilized in accordance with procedures detailed in Rule 4.15.11 (2) (c). As inferred under Rule 4.15.8 (3) (ii), relaxation of the herbaceous production standard for areas targeting wildlife habitat post-mining land uses is designed to compensate for revegetation techniques (prescribed ecological reclamation approach) that must discourage grasses to encourage shrubs in the post-revegetated community. Justifications for reduction to 70% are identical to those presented for cover in the previous section. Woodv Plant Density - Pre-2008 Revegetation Cedar Creek Associates, Inc.'s recent in-depth analysis of past "shrub conducive efforts" (report dated April, 2007) attempted by Colowyo on older (pre-2008) reclamation has resulted in the conclusion that such past efforts can largely be considered a failure and techniques such as bare-root or containerized plantings should no longer be attempted. It has become obvious to all parties concerned (including Colowyo, their consultants, the researchers at Colorado State University, the CDRMS, and the CDOW) that reclamation practices utilized historically were far more conducive to establishing herbaceous species at the expense of woody species. (It is for this reason that post-2008 reclamation, using different reclamation techniques will have a different success criterion.) Furthermore, the continued existence of herbaceous species at elevated densities, along with browsing by big game animals, continues to preclude opportunities for establishment and/or growth of woody species populations. In effect, historic (and expensive) attempts to establish shrub populations into these "dense herbaceous stands" using the best technology available at the time have met with nearly complete failure. Only a few remnant plants and "patches" of shrubs remain in the reclamation, and many of those surviving plants were established from seed in the mix as opposed to seedling planting. In this regard, all parties (including the CDOW) are in general agreement that older (pre- 2008) revegetation at Colowyo's operations favors the livestock grazing aspect of the 4.15-18 Revision Date: 3/14/08 Revision No.: TR-72