Laserfiche WebLink
reIat?on ? init?all e?aploed, with the reulti? conelu?i?n that sample a?e??a?c <br />?va.s nat aehieve. ?'he ??ear 1? re ort e?nplo the cc?rreet for??u?a pecifiec? in <br />yule ?.I x.11, with the result that ?. statltically aeq?ate ???mple was oht?ine both ?rear?. <br />For the rasland cor??nunt the a r+?ve lan ail??vs ft?r ooh lent ?ensit ?ueeess <br />tp ? +?e???n?trate ?1l?l ?, CQ1? lets eer?su C?llnt, an a?terr?tlve t? sarrrpl?n, U?in ? <br />Drell ?eflr?e? ?otoeo? to ensure an accurate eou?1t. ?'he census rrretl?od used was <br />?" <br />approved before the ?cu?-rent reultlons hecatne e??'e?tve, and the rr?ethQ?d is mere <br />stria eat than sai? lire ??nethe?s spec???ed in the reulatic?r?s; and er-r?r 1n c?untin is <br />more likely to result ?n "under-ct?unt?? than "over-daunt". Year I census results in the <br />assland cornrnunit indicated oed sterns per acre, ar?d dear census n?lcate? <br />?S +??? stems per acre, c?npare+? t?o the success standard cif ?tenas per acre. <br />Altl?ou h the re . IatiQr?s ?? net specifically address the Natal census metl?ad, applied <br />?n this case It ? actually ??nore ?rec?se than sa?npl?n,, and i ?vaul recc?mrnend that eve <br />acre t the census as a vain dem?anstration ?af success for the small rasland area ao? <br />p <br />stun density standard. <br />Yr? eoncl?sior?, the re?ererteed report in my oplnio? provides appropriate <br />?oeumen?atior? to cor?clu?e that the re?eet?te?l are?.s at ??ue hbon ?aeet all <br />appli?ahle revee??tio?. su?ces +?rlteria. <br />Let the know i?` you lave and questions.