My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-08-14_REVISION - C1981018
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2007-08-14_REVISION - C1981018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:17:39 PM
Creation date
9/18/2009 10:26:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/14/2007
Doc Name
Review & Response Memo
From
Dan Mathews
To
Kent Gorham
Type & Sequence
TR65
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLOMDO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />INTERNAL MEMORANDUM <br />DATE: August 14, 2007 <br />TO: Kent Gorham <br />FROM: Dan Mathews <br />RE: Deserado TR-65 (Response To Mid-term Review) <br />File C-1981-018 <br />COLORADO <br />D I V I S I ON OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />Harris D. Sherman <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />I have reviewed mid-term review Item Responses 7 through 14 and associated amended pages, <br />included in Scott Wanstedt's submittal to you, dated June 28, 2007. My comments are presented <br />below, numbered to correspond to the Item Responses as submitted. <br />Let me know if you have any questions. <br />7. DRMS had raised questions concerning the need to reevaluate and possibly revise <br />revegetation strategies and/or goals, given the possibly conflicting objectives of the current <br />revegetation plan. The potential conflict arises due to the heavy presence of the aggressively <br />competitive species, cheatgrass, in significant portions of the permit area. More definitive <br />choices may need to be made in some reclaimed area locations, as to whether focus of <br />revegetation efforts should be to establish a diverse, native dominated shrub grassland <br />community, or whether use of introduced perennial species that may be better able to <br />establish and persist in the presence of cheatgrass competition should be emphasized. <br />Depending on the resolution of this issue, modifications of the currently approved <br />revegetation plan may be warranted, including changes to seedmixes and success standards. <br />DRMS suggested that this issue should be the focus of a site visit/meeting involving <br />representatives of DRMS, BME, BLM, and CDOW. BME has indicated agreement with the <br />on-site meeting suggestion, and arrangements are underway to schedule the meeting. The <br />Division has no further questions or comments regarding this item at this time. <br />Depending on the outcome of the meeting and subsequent discussions, revision of the <br />revegetation plan may be requested. <br />Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation <br />Denver • Grand Junction • Durango <br />Office of <br />Active and Inactive Mines <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.