Laserfiche WebLink
27.) Will the scale house/office remain on site as indicated on the reclamation plan map <br />in the upland area north of the industrial site? If not, please report the dimensions of the <br />scale and what material the scale is made of. Also please provide the dimensions of the <br />office and the material it is made of. If the office is on a concrete slab, what are its <br />dimensions? <br />6.4.19 EXHIBIT S - Permanent Man-Made Structures <br />28.) Please submit evidence that an attempt was made to reach an agreement with Weld <br />County for the Poudre Trail and the Fence. In the mean time, the Division will conduct a <br />review of the stability analysis submitted with the application. <br />Other Issues: <br />29.) Enclosed are three letters from the Division of Water Resources, Office of <br />Archaeology and Historic Preservation, and the Army Corps of Engineers. Please <br />respond to their concerns. Also, the objection letter from Mr. William Rodman is <br />enclosed, which you have already responded to. <br />This concludes the Division's preliminary adequacy review of this application. Please <br />remember that the Division must make its recommendation to the Board to approve or <br />deny this application by October 15th, 2009. As previously mentioned if you are unable <br />to provide satisfactory responses to any inadequacies prior to this date, it will be your <br />responsibility to request an extension of time to allow for continued review of this <br />application. If there are still unresolved issues when the recommendation date arrives <br />and no extension has been requested, the Division will recommend denial of the <br />application. If you have any questions, please contact me at (303) 866-3567 ext. 8120. <br />Sincerely, <br />V <br />Jared Ebert <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Cc: Anne Johnson, Lafarge West, Inc. / with enclosures <br />Tony Waldron, DRMS <br />Enclosures: <br />1.) Objection Letter, from Mr. William Rodman, received August 18th, 2009 <br />2.) Comments from the Army Corps of Engineers, received July 27th, 2009 <br />3.) Comments from the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, <br />received July 24th, 2009 <br />4.) Comments from the Division of Water Resources, received August 3`d, 2009 <br />6