Laserfiche WebLink
x??????e <br />september 14, 209 <br />Page ? <br />3 ? e recently reviewed ?`echnical Revision No. 9 fvr the Hamilton ll?ine regarding retention <br />of Pond ? ? a permanent post-mine featuxe. Information presented for ?'R-1 D in particular <br />pages ?,0-?11 and ??aJ-111 appears to be the Barrie ?nformatton presented 1n TIC-9 regarding <br />the permanent impaundn?ent dernanstratian. ?f concern is that vie had substantial <br />comments regarding the mater quality denaonstratian for Pond ? that do not appear to have <br />been incorporated into the ??-l? revised pages submittal, If approval of T-9 is still <br />pending then eve need to be sure that consistent updated information is incorporated into the <br />permit document and the revised pages for the TR-1? submittal should be updated <br />accardingl, <br />Let me kno?r rf you have questions or require add1tlvnal 1r?formatlon, <br />c: ands Brown