My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-09-04_REVISION - M1997032
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1997032
>
2009-09-04_REVISION - M1997032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:20:34 PM
Creation date
9/9/2009 8:52:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997032
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/4/2009
Doc Name
Technical adequacy comments
From
DRMS
To
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
uranium ore, affecting the staging area and structures near the shaft. The surface of this area has not <br />undergone final reclamation nor been checked for adequate removal of traces of ore, and future use of the <br />site may again include the handling of ore. As such, the current presence of a toxic-forming material on the <br />permitted area justifies the Division's determination that this mine is a DMO. If Denison disputes that <br />uranium is a toxic-forming material or contends that uranium is not present in the permitted area please <br />provide the rationale explaining that position. <br />Environmental Protection Facilities (EPFs). In Section 6.0 Denison states, "...future EPFs are not planned to <br />be constructed, because neither designated chemicals, nor toxic- or acid-forming materials or acid rock <br />drainage are present at the Van 4 Mine." <br />DRMS response: Again, it is the Division's position that uranium is a toxic-forming material and that this <br />permit is a DMO. The Division believes that uranium is present, even if it is restricted to traces of ore and <br />low-grade ore that were stored or handled on the working surface of the staging area pad and ore bins where <br />it may be incorporated into the pad material. That area's surface is not lined and the subsurface material is <br />permeable, which allows leachate from the ore to potentially migrate into the ground. Please state whether <br />there are other areas of the site, based on the justification given above, that should be considered as EPFs and <br />if applicable, a plan for remediation or improvement. <br />Ore storage pad. The Division is not aware of any ore presently stored on the pad or in the ore bins, nor of <br />any new ore being mined, though the permit is approved for such activities when mining resumes. If and <br />when mining and stockpiling of ore resumes, the Division assumes that the residence time of the stockpiled <br />ore will be only a matter of days. Pursuant to Hard Rock/Metals Rule 6.4.20(7) it is appropriate that the ore <br />stockpile areas be considered EPFs. Prior to future stockpiling, Denison must demonstrate that the existing <br />ore stockpile areas provide adequate containment of runoff and leachate of the toxic-forming materials, or <br />perform the construction tasks necessary for the ore pad to provide such containment. Please see the <br />attached "General Ore Pad Construction Criteria." Please demonstrate that the ore pads have been properly <br />constructed and tested to meet those requirements, or propose a construction and certification plan, with a <br />timeframe. <br />Unsaturated (UNSAT-H) model and percolation estimation. Denison has provided information showing the <br />limited mobility and reduced threat from various minerals in the mined and unmined rock material, based on <br />the geologic characteristics as well as the and climate at the mine. The wettest months are August through <br />October, which suggests that precipitation during those months is delivered via thunderstorms - potentially <br />high intensity events. It is known that plumes can form beneath waste rock facilities in and climates in <br />response to seasonal patterns of such high intensity events. Please address the following: Does the model <br />account for high-intensity, short-duration precipitation events such as thunderstorms? If not, what effect <br />would these have on percolation estimates? <br />Permanent stormwater structures. The Division requires that stormwater runoff originating from the affected <br />areas (pad surfaces and slopes, stockpile areas, and roads) be controlled adequately. In light of the thorough <br />treatment of these items, indicated in the Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) prepared for CDPHE- <br />WQCD, the Division considers such runoff and its control during the mine's active and inactive phases to be <br />adequately addressed. However, the EPP states that certain stormwater control structures will be permanent, <br />and remain on the site after final reclamation. The SWMP document, included in this EPP within <br />Attachment D, reiterates the statement that certain Swales and Diversion Ditches will be permanent and
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.