My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-09-02_REVISION - M1978039HR
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1978039
>
2009-09-02_REVISION - M1978039HR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:20:33 PM
Creation date
9/9/2009 8:52:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978039HR
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/2/2009
Doc Name
Technical adequacy comments
From
DRMS
To
Denison Mines (USA) Corp.
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
material or that uranium is not present in the permitted area please provide the rationale explaining that <br />position. <br />Environmental Protection Facilities (EPFs). In Section 6.0 Denison states, "...future EPFs are not planned to <br />be constructed, because neither designated chemicals, nor toxic- or acid-forming materials or acid rock <br />drainage are present at the Sunday Group Mines." <br />DRMS response: Again, it is the Division's position that uranium is a toxic-forming material and that this <br />permit is a DMO. The Division believes that uranium is present, even if it is restricted to traces of ore and <br />low-grade ore that were stored on the pad, on the working surface of the pad, and/or in reworked areas of the <br />pad and loadout where it may be incorporated into the pad material. The pad surface is not lined and the <br />subsurface material is permeable, which allows leachate from the ore to potentially move through the pad. <br />Please state whether there are other areas of the site, based on the justification given above, that should be <br />considered as EPFs and if applicable, a plan for remediation or improvement. <br />Ore storage pad. The Division is not aware of any ore presently stored on the pad nor of any new ore being <br />hauled from the portal, though the permit is approved for such activities. If and when hauling. and <br />stockpiling of ore resumes, the Division assumes that the residence time of the ore stockpile will be only a <br />matter of days (similar to Denison's other permitted operations in this group). Pursuant to Hard Rock/Metals <br />Rule 6.4.20(7) it is appropriate that the ore stockpile areas be considered EPFs. Prior to future stockpiling, <br />Denison must demonstrate that the existing ore stockpile areas provide adequate containment of runoff and <br />leachate of the toxic-forming materials, or perform the construction tasks necessary for the ore pad to <br />provide such containment. Please see the attached "General Ore Pad Construction Criteria." Please confirm <br />that the ore pads have been properly constructed and tested to meet those requirements, or propose a <br />construction and certification plan, with a timeframe. <br />Unsaturated (UNSAT-H) model and percolation estimation. Denison has provided information showing the <br />limited mobility and reduced threat from various minerals in the mined and unmined rock material, based on <br />the geologic characteristics as well as the and climate at the mine. The wettest months are August through <br />October, which suggests that precipitation during those months is delivered via thunderstorms - potentially <br />high intensity events. It is known that plumes can form beneath waste rock facilities in and climates in <br />response to seasonal patterns of such high intensity events. Please address the following: Does the model <br />account for high-intensity, short-duration precipitation events such as thunderstorms? If not, what effect <br />would these have on percolation estimates? <br />Permanent stormwater structures. The Division requires that stormwater runoff originating from the affected <br />areas (pad surfaces and slopes, stockpile areas, and roads) be controlled adequately. The Division considers <br />such runoff and its control during the mining phase (including periods of temporary cessation, if any) to be <br />adequately addressed. However, the EPP states that certain stormwater control structures will be permanent, <br />and remain on the site after final reclamation. The StormwaterManagement Plan (SWMP) prepared for <br />CDPHE-WQCD, and included in this EPP within Attachment F, reiterates the statement that certain Swales <br />and Diversion Ditches will be permanent and remain onsite, though which specific structures are not <br />identified. It is the Division's concern that there may be some such structures onsite that are planned to <br />remain after reclamation (understood to be after monitoring and maintenance by the operator have ceased) <br />that may not be able to continue functioning adequately to control, convey or divert their designed working <br />capacity. The design capacity and the design storm event were not found described in the EPP or in the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.