Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF COLORADO <br />I]I1?I?lDN OF RECLAMAT`I?N, MINING ANQ SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />? ? 13 Sherman St., Room 2i 5 <br />Denver, Colorado 8?2?3 <br />?hor?e: ?3?3} $6?-3567 <br />SAX: X303} 832-8i 06 <br />September 4, 2009 <br />Tonga K. ?Iammod <br />J. E, stover ? Associates <br />?nov?cap foal company, Inc. <br />?? ?. Boy 1430 <br />palisade, 0 152 <br />Ike: roadside 14Yine ?Perrr?t No. -1?1?04?} <br />200$ Revegetation ?valuatio?a Report <br />Dear s. Hammond: <br />GOLORADG <br />DIVISION 0? <br />R??LAMATt?N <br />N?INtN <br />&? <br />?AF?TY <br />Bil[ Ritter, Jr, <br />Gavernar <br />Harris D. S[?erman <br />?X?C17iIY? Director <br />Ronald 1N, Cottony <br />Division Director <br />Natural Resource Yrustee <br />The Division of Reclamation, Mining and safety ?Divlion}has completed Its review of the 2005 <br />Revegetation Evaluation Report. The report was submitted by J.E, stover and Associates, Inc., <br />on behalf of no?vcap foal company ?nav?cap}, as part of nocap?s 2008 Annual <br />Reclamation Report. The report was prepared by cedar creek Associates, Iris, ACA}, the <br />vegetation consultant to nacap. <br />The report vas very thorough and Drell organized. arripling methods and locations mere fully <br />described using narrative, maps, and illustrations, and data ?verc clearly presented using charts <br />and tables, supplemented v?rith solar photos of the various sampled areas. summary narrative <br />vas concise and ?e11 supported. Mr, Dan Niathe?us of our office reviewed the report and has vne <br />paint of clarification regarding section 1.2 Bac]? ?a?nd aid Standards o? '?cces?, and a number <br />of conunents regarding Section 4,Q .Recom?n??d?tions. <br />Section 1.2 <br />l . At the bottom of page 2, continuing onto page 3, A presents the species diversity <br />standard and recommends a modification to the standard. The rnodi?ication ?A <br />recommends is argued to be necessary, because ".. ,the ubiquitous and invasive annual <br />grass, cheatgrass ??4nisa??a ?ec?or?n}, has relative saver values approaching or <br />surpassing 70?/o in years favorable to growth in both reference areas, as e11 as se?reral <br />revegetated units". <br />The Division does not dispute the heavy presence o? cheatgrass over much of the permit <br />area, reclaimed and undisturbed areas alike, but the provision of the diversity standard <br />CAA expresses concern with is no longer in effect. The current standard, approved in <br />200, includes the folla?ving provision ??ODS revised language is in bald}: <br />?ffi?? of Office of <br />Mined Land E?e?lam?tion Denver * Grand J?n?tion • Durango Active and Inactive Mines