Laserfiche WebLink
Revised `Letters of Understanding' have been mailed certified with return receipt, and <br />include the necessary language. A copy of the letter and proofs of certified mail and any <br />return receipts or signed letters will be provided to the Office under separate cover. <br />9. The Applicant has indicated that an agreement to relocate the gas lines in Tract A <br />is pending. Without an actual agreement in place, the Division cannot approve the <br />Reclamation Permit in its current form. The Applicant may submit an alternative Mining <br />and Reclamation Plan that accounts for the existing gas lines. When an agreement with <br />owner of the gas lines is finalized, the Applicant may file a Technical Revision to address <br />the relocation of the gas lines. Please commit to maintaining a 200 foot buffer around the <br />gas lines until an agreement is reached. In addition, please illustrate the 200 foot buffer <br />on all of the maps. <br />No extraction related activities will occur within the 200 foot of any existing oil and gas <br />line without first making a good faith effort to obtain an agreement with the owner of the <br />facilities that damage to any of their structures will be compensated for by the applicant; <br />and failing that, confirmation with the Office that our structural analysis is sufficient to <br />extract within the 200 foot boundary to the extent shown. Further, extraction will not <br />occur inside Tract A without a prior agreement to relocate any lines necessary to allow <br />for the practical extraction of Tract A. <br />We still maintain that the presence of any oil and gas lines that obstruct a valuable <br />mineral deposit are placed in direct violation of Title 34; and complicit with Weld County <br />inaction and inappropriate regulatory oversight on the part of the Colorado Oil and Gas <br />Commission; which we understand is beyond the purview of the Office. Regardless, any <br />extraction and reclamation plan for Tract A is conditional upon satisfaction of this <br />concern, as stated above, and an understood condition to any permit approval. <br />Once the agreement for and subsequent relocation of the gas lines have occurred for Tract <br />A; the extraction and reclamation plan shown for Tract A will conform to the approved <br />plan as shown in Exhibit C-2: Mine Plan Map. We believe this statement is consistent <br />with our understanding determined at the 4 August 2009 meeting with the Office. <br />Respective of the 200 foot buffer for the lines as they presently occur, we have submitted <br />a second effort to obtain agreements. The first effort failed to request notarized <br />signatures. The second effort requests notarized signatures. We have not received any <br />objections from the oil and gas entities for our operations, and believe in the absence of <br />any written agreement following our last effort, that the Stability Analysis of Exhibit S <br />will support the present plan. <br />6.4.5 Exhibit E - Reclamation Plan <br />10. The Applicant states the post-mining land use will include industrial/commercial, <br />general agriculture, and residential. Rule 6.4.5(b) states in those instances where the <br />post-mining land use is for industrial, residential, or commercial purposes, appropriate <br />evidence supporting such reasonable assurance shall be submitted. As the Applicant <br />Vaasa Companies, Inc. correspondence of 1 September 2009 to the Colorado Office of Mined Land 5 <br />Reclamation (Office) in reply to Office correspondence of 27 July 2009 - Heintzelman Project - <br />M2009-018.