My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-08-26_HYDROLOGY - M1999002
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1999002
>
2009-08-26_HYDROLOGY - M1999002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:55:03 PM
Creation date
8/27/2009 9:54:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
8/26/2009
Doc Name
Review of Mechanical Integrity Test Results
From
Allen Sorenson
To
Travis Marshall
Email Name
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />DATE; <br />TO: <br />FROM <br />RE: <br />August 26, 2009 <br />Travis Marshall l/ <br />Allen Sorenson <br />Rev, iew of Mechanical Integrity Test Results, American Soda, LLP, <br />Yankee Gulch Sodium Minerals Project, Permit No. M-1999-002 <br /> <br /> <br />COLORADO <br />D I V I S I ON OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />Harris D. Sherman <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />The Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) engineering staff has reviewed the Mechanical <br />Integrity Test (MIT) results from the testing that was done on American Soda's idle solution mining wells in <br />2008 and has discussed the results with Celina Akin, Environmental Specialist with American Soda. Based <br />on the review, it is likely that the wells that failed MIT are leaking around the cast iron bridge plugs that <br />were placed in the lower part of the strings when the wells were taken out of service. The rationale for this <br />determination is: <br />1. The wells that failed MIT required substantially more water to fill than the wells that passed, <br />indicating that the passing wells were still full of water from 2006 MIT, whereas the failed wells had <br />drained through the bridge plugs. <br />2. The coil inserted into the failed wells to place plugging cement tripped smoothly to the bridge plugs <br />indicating that there are no casing ruptures on which the coil could have been hung up. <br />3. The bridge plug elevations have not changed since the time of placement demonstrating that the <br />casings have not been stretched by subsidence. <br />4. No water from the dissolution surface or other water bearing strata was in the failed wells, and if any <br />water is entering the well string through damaged casing it is flowing down into the mined cavities <br />through leaking bridge plugs rather than building up in the string to pressures that might lead to <br />comingling of water between strata. <br />It is unlikely that the failed wells could cause ground water degradation, for the following reasons: <br />1. There is no significant hydrostatic pressure in the cased strings. <br />2. As discussed above, it is likely that the casings are intact, i.e., leaking casing is not the cause of the <br />MIT failures. <br />3. There are no indications of contamination in the results of the on-going ground water monitoring <br />program. <br />Therefore, there is no reason to change the current program in which the production strings undergo MIT <br />every two years and failed wells are plugged and abandoned. DRMS should inspect the 2010 MIT project. <br />Ms. Akin has agreed to notify DRMS in advance of the project so that an inspection can be scheduled. <br />cc: David Bird, DRMS, via email c:\acs files\My Documents 4-19-06 thru\amsoda MIT review.doc <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.