My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-08-24_REVISION - C1982056 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2009-08-24_REVISION - C1982056 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:55:01 PM
Creation date
8/25/2009 1:24:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/24/2009
Doc Name
Sage Creek Subsidence Project Cultural Resources Inventory
From
MAC Metcalf Archaeological Consultants, Inc
To
BLM
Type & Sequence
PR8
Email Name
JHB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
sediments. One only needs to inspect the cliffs along Routt County Road 27 near the Twentymile <br />Coal Company headquarters to see direct evidence of subsidence impacts on the rock formations <br />in the area. On the other hand, vast areas of subsided land in the immediate vicinity cannot readily <br />be recognized as having been subsided. So the effects on cultural resources from subsidence will <br />depend upon the nature of the resource itself and on the nature of the landscape where the site is <br />situated. Sites most sensitive to the effects of subsidence include rockshelter and rock art sites <br />located on or beneath rock outcrops. Standing structures are also sensitive to the effects of <br />subsidence. <br />Site types not sensitive to the effects of subsidence would include surface and shallowly <br />buried historic and prehistoric sites located in open terrain. Sites where the effects of subsidence <br />have not been adequately documented include buried and/or stratified archaeological sites, and sites <br />located in proximity to streams whose gradients and courses might be slightly altered by subsidence <br />and a resulting change in erosion patterns. Some very limited potential for impacts to archaeological <br />sites along Fish Creek, Grassy Creek, and intermittent tributaries can be anticipated as the channel <br />reverts to base gradient after subsidence. Changes in the floodplain hold little potential for <br />disturbance simply because those sediments are so recent. The areas of concern, however, are the <br />terraces and benches that parallel the floodplain which may be impacted by lateral channel migration <br />and increased erosion in situations where those surfaces see a relative increase in height above the <br />floodplain. <br />Cliff bands and unstable or steep slopes have potential to collapse or slump during or <br />following subsidence, as clearly demonstrated by the cliff fall above the current mine headquarters <br />where MAC excavated the Red Army Rockshelter, 5RT345, in 1993 and 1994 (Pool 1997). Such <br />disturbance would certainly have an impact on sites found in these areas, particularly rockshelter <br />sites and rock art sites. <br />Finally, standing historic (or prehistoric) structures also have potential to be impacted by any <br />differential settling associated with subsidence. In this particular project area, no prehistoric <br />structural remains are anticipated (given the terrain, and recent uses as open pasture and hayfields), <br />but there is potential for historic Euroamerican structures such as houses, barns and other buildings, <br />primarily associated with ranching. <br />FIELD AND LABORATORY METHODS <br />Given the above, and in order to address the potential effects of subsidence without <br />conducting an inventory of the entire mine permit area, MAC proposed a modified inventory <br />methodology designed to locate and record site types that are sensitive to the effects of subsidence, <br />as well as to inventory all settings where there is reasonable expectation that subsidence may have <br />an effect on the integrity of sites. The inventory strategy was to focus on landforms and topographic <br />features where there is potential for surface disturbance, slumping or collapse. It was also to focus <br />specifically on locating and recording standing historic structures. This strategy was discussed in <br />a Class I report separately submitted to, and reviewed by the Bureau of Land Management, Little <br />Snake Resource Area, and the Colorado Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (Metcalf <br />and McKibbin 2008). The methods proposed in that document were followed in this study. <br />14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.