Laserfiche WebLink
C-1982-056 TR-67 <br />PAR - M LT <br />06-Aug-2009 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />face of the CRDA, as the critical section. The model predicts a FS of 2.3 for a failure <br />surface confined to the coal mine waste (fully constructed pile configuration) and FS of <br />2.2 for a failure surface which also incorporates the upper portion of the reclaimed spoil. <br />In the computer models presented by NWCC, a cohesion value of 0 psi and a unit weight <br />of 115 pcf were assumed for the coal refuse material, which would be the "worst case" <br />scenario. At internal friction angles of 25 and 30 degrees, lower factors of safety (1.17 <br />and 1.45, respectively) were calculated for the outer face of the fill, indicating that a <br />shallow failure on the face of the fill slope may possibly occur if insufficient compaction <br />is attained near the edge of slope. <br />A review of the_1995 CTL/Thompson study found in Exhibit 26A of the, current Permit <br />reveals that internal friction angles of 30 to 35 degrees and unit weights of 80 to 100 pcf <br />were used in the design of the existing 3 MM cubic yard CRDA. These less conservative <br />values resulted in an allowable slope design of 2.8:1, as opposed to the 3:1 slope <br />presented in the current revision application. <br />The CRDA design proposed has been shown to be stable (with a Factor of Safety >1.5) <br />with respect to any large, circular failure. However, the data provided by NWCC <br />indicate that shallow failures on the face of the fill slope may be somewhat more likely to <br />occur (although not with dire consequences). If, during Phase I or II construction of the <br />CRDA, shallow failures are observed on the face of the fill with any frequency, the <br />proposed slope configuration should be modified (flattened) to prevent such failures from <br />occurring in future phases. <br />Please provide additional language in Section 2.05 of the permit to address actions that <br />will be taken, should there be shallow slope failures observed on the face of the CRDA <br />fill. <br />Rule 4.11- COAL MINE WASTE <br />4.11.4(3 - Disposal of Non-Coal Waste <br />TCC does not propose to dispose of any non-coal waste in the CRDA. <br />4.11.5 - Dams and Embankments <br />"Embankment" is defined as follows: "an artificial deposit of material that is raised <br />above the natural surface of the land and used to contain, divert, or store water, support <br />roads or railways, or for other similar purposes." <br />The CRDA expansion is not being proposed for any of these purposes. Therefore, it is <br />the Division's determination that the conditions of Rule 4.11 do not apply to this <br />revision. <br />This concludes my adequacy comments for TR-67. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any <br />questions you may have. <br />Cc: Sandy Brown