My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-08-01_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981013
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981013
>
2007-08-01_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:17:38 PM
Creation date
8/11/2009 9:39:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/1/2007
Doc Name
Letter on Permit Transfer
From
Ann Tatum
To
DRMS & AGS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 1, 2007 <br />Page 2 <br />Westmoreland Coal Company would be in compliance with 30 CFR §774.17, <br />Transfer, Assignment or Sale of Permit Rights if Westmoreland Coal Company was the <br />permittee/applicant. As DRMS has failed and refused to follow the law, Basin Resources, <br />Inc. is not in compliance nor is Westmoreland Coal Company. <br />The Certificate of Liability provided to me by Mr. Berry dated May 27, 2007 <br />indicates that the "INSURED" is Westmoreland Coal Company. <br />30 CFR § 774.15 Permit renewals (ii) requires evidence of liability insurance by <br />the applicant (Basin) not Westmoreland- <br />The enclosed redacted letter dated July 16, 2007 from Morris Kegley, Legal <br />counsel for Basin Resources, Inc. states "Westmoreland Coal Company is not responsible <br />for the debts of Basin Resources". Reclamation is a debt. Further he states, Basin has <br />no assets or revenue, and the glaring admission is that Mr. Kegley refers to Basin as a <br />"judgment proof corporate debtor". Admission that Basin has no assets or revenue and <br />that Westmoreland Coal Company is not responsible for Basin's debt equates to no <br />economic assurance of compliance with reclamation. An operator is financially <br />responsible for repairing material damage resulting from subsidence. This information <br />directly contradicts the requirements of DRMS and OSM. The Reclamation Bond that <br />DRMS has for Permit C-81-013 states under Additional Provisions of the bond: "The <br />amount of this bond is based upon estimates... and does not operate to liquate, limit, <br />enlarge or restrict the Principal's (Basin) obligation to complete the reclamation <br />plan and to comply in all respects with the permit and with applicable laws and <br />regulations governing reclamation, even though the actual cost thereof may <br />substantially exceed the amount of this bond." The Principal in this instance is Basin <br />who DRMS knows has no revenue or assets with which to pay any amount over the <br />amount of the actual bond and that Basin claims to be a judgment proof debtor. DRMS <br />has now been placed on formal notice that there are no funds over and above the actual <br />amount of the reclamation bond to pay for any reclamation debt exceeding $173,000.00. <br />It is glaringly clear that DRMS is ignoring the federal law requirements. I have <br />attempted to be civil in my ongoing discourse with DRMS and OSM regarding the issue <br />of Basin Resources' failures to comply with both Colorado and Federal regulations, <br />however Mr. Berry's July 26, 2007 letter leaves me somewhat amazed, frustrated, and <br />quite frankly, angry. Basin Resources, Inc. HAS NOT PROVIDED THE REQUIRED <br />LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE. BASIN RESOURCES, INC. IS NOT THE <br />VALID PERMITTEE. <br />£'d L99ti-L£6-C LL wn}sl uuV dL9:Z0 LO LO 6nV
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.