My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-03-06_PERMIT FILE - C1981012A (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2009-03-06_PERMIT FILE - C1981012A (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2017 9:39:10 AM
Creation date
8/4/2009 11:01:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/6/2009
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 22 NPDES Permit
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CO-0000906 <br />New Elk Mine Water Quality Assessment <br />0 <br />• utfall According to the Classifications and Numeric Standards for Arkansas s thRiver e re Basin, inOwaters are <br />receiving stream segment COARLA06 is Use Protected <br />designated as Use Protected, no antidegradation review is necessary in accordance with the <br />regulations. <br />According to the Classifications and Numeric Standards for Arkansas River Basin, Outfall 001 <br />receiving stream segment COARLA05a is Undesignated. Thus, an antidegradation review is <br />required for this segment if new or increased impacts are found to occur for Outfall 001. <br />Note that the AD review will be completed on the 200 gpm flow rate, as this is the expected flow <br />rate from this facility after mine dewatering is completed. As facility data for the parameters covered <br />under this review does not exist, a MON outfall is being incorporated into the permit to collect data. <br />By the time data is collected, and potentially used to perform a Reasonable Potential analysis, the <br />facility should only be discharging at the 200 gpm now rate. <br />The Division's Antidegradation Significance Determination for New or Increased Water Quality <br />Impacts Procedural Guidance provides guidance on the determination of new or increased water <br />quality impacts and significant degradation. Consistent with current Division procedures, the <br />baseline water quality (BWQ) concentrations for pollutants of concern should be established so that <br />it can be used as part of anti degradation reviews. BWQ is defined by the Division as the condition of <br />the water quality as of September 30, 2000. Furthermore, the Division specifies that BWQ <br />concentration will include the influence of the discharger if it was in place on September 30, 2000. <br />Accordingly, BWQ concentrations are determined based on either downstream ambient water quality <br />data, or based on the following equation: <br />BWQ = Mef-Qejr +MU/5 QuIs <br />Qeff + Q„/5 <br />Where, <br />BWQ = Baseline water quality <br />QUIS = Upstream low flow during the antidegradation period <br />XIS = Upstream background pollutant concentration at the existing quality during the <br />Qeff <br />Me <br />antidegradation period <br />= 2-year average flow <br />= 2-year average effluent pollutant concentration <br />Because the New Elk Mine Outfall 001 did not discharge to the Middle Fork of the Purgatoire River <br />for the time frame from October 1, 1995 to September 30, 2000, a value of zero was used for Qeffand <br />Meffwhen establishing the BWQ. When Qeffand M,•ffare equal to zero, the following results: <br />0 BWQ=M./, <br />Appendix A (wQn Version s-a(FASL)) Page 23 of 29 Last Revised August 26, 2008
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.