My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-03-06_PERMIT FILE - C1981012A (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2009-03-06_PERMIT FILE - C1981012A (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2017 9:39:10 AM
Creation date
8/4/2009 11:01:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/6/2009
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 22 NPDES Permit
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, Water Quality Control Division <br />Rationale - Page 24, Permit No. CO-0000906 <br />lua <br />eva <br />ether b. Ground Water Protection -Pond 6 is not lined a there <br />brequeen <br />ed by the Cons olorado Dischar he Permit Sysote6 <br />currently meets the allowable exfiltration rate of <br />0 <br />Regulations. Therefore, a compliance schedule <br />groundwater protection prog amhas neece?sary,i ?s?f ? h beloand e <br />installation of liners or the development of goun <br />Permit Citation Due Date <br />Code Event Description <br />50008 Preliminary Plan Investigate and submit conclusive information on the seepage from Part I.A.3. 06130109 <br />Completed Pond 6 to determine if the allowable exfltration rate of 10' em/sec <br />is exceeded. If liner integrity is the basis for determination that the <br />seepage meets the criteria, then the report must be prepared by a <br />professional engineer registered in Colorado. <br />53999 Submit Work If the study indicates that Pond 6 exceeds the allowable seepage rate Part I.A.3. 12131109 <br />Plans of 10 cm/sec, the facility either (1) submit a work plan for the <br />installation of a liner for Pond 6; (2) submit a work plan for the <br />installation of monitoring wells; or (3) submit a letter stating that <br />the point of compliance will be at the point of influent to Pond 6 <br />along with a permit modification request. <br />If the study indicates that Pond 6 discharges at a seepage rate less <br />than 10-6 cm/sec, the remainder of this compliance schedule will be <br />deemed complete. <br />Part LA .3. I2131110 <br />54299 Complete Work If the study indicated that Pond 6 exceeds the allowable seepage <br />Plans rate of 10-6 cm/sec and the permittee has opted to line Pond 6, the <br />permittee must submit a report completed by a professional engineer <br />• registered in the state of Colorado indicating that the liners have <br />been replaced. The report must certify that the liner material meets <br />the allowable seepage rate of 10-6 centimeters per second or less, <br />and that the placement was accomplished according to the <br />manufacturer's requirements (i.e., all welds were tested and the <br />liners were checked for holes prior to backfilling). Further, the <br />permittee must submit a request for permit modification to eliminate <br />both Outfal1033 limitations and monitoring requirements and <br />Monitoring Wells 050A-050D limitations and monitoring <br />requirements. <br />If the study indicated that Pond 6 exceeds the allowable seepage <br />rate of 10-6 cm/sec and the permittee has opted to install monitoring <br />wells, notice of well completion must be submitted. Additionally, if <br />the permittee has installed more or less monitoring wells than those <br />specified in the permit, the permittee must submit a request for <br />permit modification to add or eliminate extra groundwater <br />monitoring wells' compliance points. <br />c. Sediment Control Plan - In accordance with 40 CFR Part 434.82, a site-specific Sediment Control Plan must be <br />developed. The Sediment Control Plan must be designed to prevent an increase in the average annual sediment <br />yield from pre-mined, undisturbed conditions. The Sediment Control Plan must be approved by the permitting <br />authority and be incorporated into the permit as an effluent limitation. The Sediment Control Plan must identify <br />best management practices (BMPs) and also must describe design specifications, construction specifications, <br />maintenance schedules, criteria for inspection, as well as expected performance and longevity of the best <br />management practices. Using watershed models, the operator must demonstrate that implementation of the <br />Sediment Control Plan will result in average annual sediment yields that will not be greater than the sediment yield <br />levels from pre-mined, undisturbed conditions. The operator must use the same watershed model that was, or will <br />be, used to acquire the SMCRA permit. The operator must design, implement, and maintain BMPs in the manner <br />specified in the Sediment Control Plan.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.