Laserfiche WebLink
SURFACE WATER RESOURCES <br />The EC permit area is within the Yampa River drainage basin. Portions of the permit area drain directly into the <br />Yampa River while others drain into the Williams Fork River. The Williams Fork River is a tributary to [he Yampa <br />River and joins the Yampa River within the permit area, There are no other significant streams or surface water <br />bodies within the permit or adjacent area. However, there are two (2) natural springs in the permit area which are <br />monitored, neither of which is significant. The total average spring flow is less than 10 gpm. <br />Surface Water Quantity <br />Flow data for the Yampa and Williams Fork Rivers in the mine vicinity has historically been recorded at four-(4) <br />United Stales Geological Survey (USGS) gauging stations. Two (2) gauging stations are located on the Yampa River. <br />These are 1) below diversion near Hayden, Colorado and 2) near Maybell, Colorado. The remaining two (2) gauging <br />stations are located on the Williams Fork River. These are l) near Hamilton, Colorado and 2) at the EC mine site. <br />The location the gauging station at EC is shown on the Hydrologic Monitoring Program Location Map, (Map 11). <br />Recently, EC and the USGS have begun monitoring flows of the Yampa and Williams Fork Rivers with staff gauges. <br />One (1) staff gauge is located on the Yampa River, downstream of the confluence with [he Williams Fork River, and <br />one (1) staff gauge is located on the Williams Fork River upstream of the No. 6 Mine. In addition, a recorder has been <br />installedjust below the Craig Power Plant Diversion on the Yampa River. <br />A summary of flows for the four-(4) USGS gauging stations is presented in Table 21, Mean Monthly Flows for the <br />Yampa and Williams Fork Rivers. <br />The Yampa River gauging station below [he Diversion, near Hayden, Colorado (USGS Station No. 09244410) is <br />located approximately 35 miles upstream of the EC Site. The drainage area at this station is 1,410 square miles and <br />the recording period is from 1966 to present. The average mean monthly flows range from a low of 236 cfs during <br />September to 6,028 cfs during May. Refer to Table 22, Extreme Flows for Yampa and Williams Fork Rivers, for <br />historical extreme flows for the Yampa and Williams Fork Rivers. <br />Monthly flows during the winter months range from between one (1) to two (2) percent of the total annual discharge. <br />The peak flow of record is 17,900 cfs recorded on May 19, 1971. A minimum flow of 2.0 cfs was recorded on July <br />17-19, 1934. The 7-day/10-year low flow was calculated by the USGS to be 37.6 cfs. <br />Flow data from the USGS stations on the Yampa River were used to derive estimated flows for the Yampa River at <br />the EC mine site. Establishing a correlation between the drainage area and discharge at the Yampa River station and <br />then extending the relationship to the Yampa River at the mine site derived the estimated flows. Results indicate that <br />the average mean monthly flow at the mine site range from approximately 180 cfs in September to approximately <br />4,700 cfs during June. The 7-day/10-year low flow was estimated to be approximately 32 cfs. <br />The Williams Fork River, a ]eft bank tributary to the Yampa River, has a drainage area of approximately 376 square <br />miles. Flow records are available for the Williams Fork River from a discontinued USGS station at Hamilton, <br />Colorado (USGS Station No. 2495). This station was operated during water years 1905 to 1906 and 1910 to 1927. <br />Average monthly means for the recording period range from 920 cfs in May to 51.2 in December. (Refer to Table <br />21, Mean Monthly Flows for the Yampa and Williams Fork River). Tha peak discharge recorded at this station was <br />3,400 cfs in June 1917. The 7-day/10-year low flow is 20.5 cfs. The station was located approximately six (6) <br />miles upstream from the mouth of the Williams Fork River and has a drainage basin of 341 square miles. Data from <br />the Williams Fork River gauging station reveal that the flow of the Williams Fork River is more dependent on <br />snowmelt than the flow of the Yampa River and that there is less ground water discharge [o sustain the flows of the <br />river during low flow periods. Because there is less ground water discharge during the low flow season, the range <br />of the flows of the Williams Fork River is higher than the range recorded at stations on the Yampa River. <br />EC installed a stream gauge on the Williams Fork River at the Haul Road Bridge, approximately 2,300 feet <br />Permit Revision 04-34 2.04-20 Revised 7/2/04 <br />