My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-02-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981022 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981022
>
2009-02-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981022 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:43:33 PM
Creation date
7/23/2009 11:25:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/10/2009
Section_Exhibit Name
2.04 Environmental Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sea n- 2.04.7 <br />searns, the following hydraulic characteristics have been estimated based on typical values presented in <br />Applied Hydrogeology (Fedder, 1988): <br />• Transnussivity- 0.90 to 0.96 <br />• Porosity- 0.0012 <br />• Aquifer Thickness - 2 to 14 feet <br />I-L.storic mining operations have encountered perched ground water, with resulting mine inflows, <br />from the E, D, C, and B coal seams or the associated overlying or underlying units. Continued <br />mining operations are expected to encounter perched ground water from the B seam (Sanborn Creek <br />Mme) and D seam (Elk Creek Mme) sequences. Recorded mine inflows to the Somerset Nine <br />workings (B seam) were approximately 235 gpm and inflow rates were relatively consistent with no <br />significant increase in discharge from caved areas following completion of pillar recovery and <br />subsequent roof collapse. Inflows to the active Sanborn Creek Nine (B and C seams) average 100 <br />gpnt, although interception of a fracture system resulted in a short-term increase in peak inflows to <br />approximately 250 gpm and inflow potential has been calculated to be as high as 400 gpm The <br />Oliver Mme was developed in the D seam, with most of the development upgradient from its <br />outcrop/sub-crop with Elk Creek Available information indicates that the Oliver Mine workings <br />were generally dry with isolated areas of limited mine inflow (0 to 6 gpm). <br />The majority of the exploration drillholes completed in the mine area have been relatively dry, with <br />occasional damp zones encountered in some of the holes and limited occurrences of actual flowing <br />ground water. Drillholes SG 1, 2, and 3 were drilled in the vicinity of the Sanborn Creek Mme. <br />Drillhole SG1 was essentially dry except for a damp zone at a depth of approximately 40 feet until it <br />intercepted the Rollins sandstone. Drillholes SC-2 and SC-3 encountered ground water in both the D <br />Coal Seam and Rollins sandstone. Mute inflow potential from the D seam below its outcrop/sub- <br />crop with Elk Creek is un-quantified at this time but drilling results indicate that the seam does <br />contain water in the vicinity of Elk Creek Inflow potential for the D, C, and B coal seams may be <br />estimated using the following relationship that is based on Darcy s Law: <br />Q - ((W)(T)"/(n)(L)) where; <br />Q is steady-state flow rate (gpd) based on the total length of exposed coal face <br />W is the width (h) of mine workings adjacent to the outcrop <br />T is transmissivity (gpd/ft) <br />H is potentiornetric head (ft) of potential recharge source above mining (Elk Creek <br />above D seam and outcrop Isubcrop above C and B seams) <br />n is coal seam porosity <br />L is distance (ft) from mine workings to outcrop <br />The results of this calculation for the respective coal seams or associated clastic sequences are as <br />follow: <br />Coal Seam ?) T ft H ft n L ft d/ m <br />D 6,600 2.00 100 0.0012 2,400 458,330/318 <br />C 17,495 0.90 200 0.0012 7,380 355,680/247 <br />B 16,050 0.96 250 0.0012 12,074 265,860/185 <br />Based on recorded mine inflows, the mine inflow estimates above are relatively accurate and can be <br />used as a general indicator of anticipated inflow rates. <br />• In most cases, the volume and rate of any perched ground water discharge at stratigraphic outcrops is <br />limited. Because most of the perched ground water occurs in near-surface units, discharge is <br />frequently ephemeral, flowing for a brief period following spring snowmelt until infiltration from <br />PR04 2.04-26 Revised August 2000
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.