My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-03-19_PERMIT FILE - C1980005
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980005
>
2009-03-19_PERMIT FILE - C1980005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:44:34 PM
Creation date
7/23/2009 11:11:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/19/2009
Doc Name
Ground Water Points of Compliance
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 07 Attachment 7-3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Twentymile Sandstone is approximately 500 feet above the Wadge Coal seam. It was present at higher <br />elevations on the permit area, but is not found in strata immediately adjacent to the Seneca II permit <br />boundary. Therefore, the Twentymile Sandstone is not affected by the mining activity at Seneca II. <br />The Trout Creek Sandstone of the Illes Formation lies approximately 300 to 400 feet below the Wadge <br />Coal seam and approximately 60 to 100 feet below the Wolf Creek Coal seam. The Trout Creek <br />sandstone is essentially under confined conditions and is separated from the surface mining by finer <br />grained lithologies of the Williams Fork Formation, which are predominantly gray to black siltstones, <br />limey shales, and silty, fine-grained sandstones. Because of the thickness and low permeability of the <br />strata separating the Trout Creek Sandstone from the mining and the upward hydraulic head below the <br />mined strata, it is unlikely that the mining could have any effect on the water quality of this unit. <br />For these reasons, the current coal mining operations at Seneca II are unlikely to significantly impact <br />bedrock groundwater offsite, and that no point of compliance is warranted for bedrock groundwater. <br />Points of Compliance - Alluvial <br />At Seneca II Mine, the flow direction of the reclaimed spoil will be predominantly towards the adjacent <br />western drainage of Little Grassy Creek and Grassy Creek, which have potential to receive direct runoff <br />and groundwater inflow from the mine operation (Figure 1). Aquifer tests conducted in the Grassy <br />Creek alluvium at Yoast and Seneca II mines showed a range of hydraulic conductivities between <br />1.06E-5 cm/s and 4.23E-4 cm/s. The low yields associated with the alluvial materials will limit its use. <br />• Nonetheless, the alluvial material has the highest hydraulic conductivity of the materials downgradient <br />of the mine site and would be most indicative of any offsite impacts. Therefore, the well GW-S70-A <br />(SGAL70) will be designated a compliance monitoring well. This well is actively being monitored and <br />will be sufficient to capture any impact to Grassy Creek alluvial groundwater quality from the Seneca II <br />Mine. Results from recent monitoring can be seen in Table 1. This table also provides the agriculture <br />and domestic use groundwater standards from Regulation 41. <br />Wells along Grassy Creek at the Seneca II Mine are analyzed for concentrations of groundwater <br />compliance parameters. Table 2 provides a statistical summary of ambient water quality data for those <br />wells. Likewise, wells in the Grassy Creek basin at the Yoast Mine, shown in Figure 2, were analyzed <br />for ambient concentrations of these constituents. Table 3 provides a statistical summary of ambient <br />water quality data for all Yoast Grassy Creek alluvial wells. The ambient cutoff date chosen was <br />1/31/94, as specified in Reg. 41. Maximum values observed in Tables 2 and 3 are also provided on <br />Table 1. Outliers in Tables 2 and 3 were indentified and not used in Table 1. Ambient values were <br />higher than the Reg. 41 standards for iron, lead, manganese and sulfates. These values are underlined on <br />Table 1 and will serve as the standard for those parameters. For all other parameters, the more stringent <br />of the Reg. 41 domestic or agricultural standards will serve as the standard. Those values are also <br />underlined on Table 1. Review of Table 1 indicates that the water quality from well GW-S70-A has not <br />exceeded any of the proposed standards from October 2005 to May 2008. <br />Potential contributors to the mineralization of the alluvial water include the underlying Lewis Shale, <br />• which is a marine shale with high concentrations of these constituents that underlies portions of the <br />TR-47 7-3-2 Revised 1/09
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.