My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-07-14_REVISION - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2009-07-14_REVISION - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:48:45 PM
Creation date
7/16/2009 1:45:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
7/14/2009
Doc Name
Responses to DRMS Email of 7/9/2009 (Adequacy Memo)
From
Forrest Luke
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Third White Sandstone emanating from the mined area will flow in a westerly direction along the axis of <br />the Big Bottom syncline. No currently existing adjudicated wells are expected to be impacted by the <br />potential development and migration of this plume. Water quality in the Third White Sandstone will not be <br />degraded to the point it is no longer suitable for current uses. <br />Water from rain and snowmelt that infiltrates the Horse Gulch and Buttress fills is not expected to <br />significantly infiltrate bedrock stratigraphic units underneath the fills because the bedrock units have low <br />permeability and the fills are not constructed on sloping land which should cause the water to flow to the <br />toe of each fill where it will discharge to the surface. <br />4.8.3.3 Post Mine Hydrologic Balance <br />Precipitation amounts are expected to be similar to pre-mine conditions after mining. Section 2.7.6.1 <br />discusses pre-mine precipitation. Evapotranspiration is likely to be less during the first few years after <br />mining because the decrease in vegetative cover should decrease transpiration. Evapotranspiration <br />should approach the pre-mine values as vegetation is re-established. <br />If recharge to the spoils is larger than pre-mine values, direct surface runoff will be reduced subsequent to <br />mining. A larger net groundwater discharge to the surface system is likely in areas where spoil springs <br />develop. These discharges could offset a decrease in direct surface runoff from the reclaimed surfaces. <br />The larger amount of groundwater discharge to springs will increase the water availability for wildlife and <br />livestock in the area for a greater portion of the year. <br />4.8.4 Impacts to Potential Alluvial Valley Systems <br />Little potential exists for impact to the Williams Fork alluvial system because very little surface water and <br />essentially no groundwater from the proposed mine plan area flow toward the Williams Fork River. <br />Section 2.7.7.1 should be consulted for details. The potential for impact to the Yampa alluvial system is <br />very small because the Upper Williams Fork aquifers yield only a very small percentage of the water in <br />this system. Additional information on the Yampa River alluvial system is given in Section 2.7.7.2. <br />Potential alluvial valley floors in the drainages leaving the proposed mine plan area are addressed in <br />Section 2.7.7.3. <br />The definition of the geologic control of groundwater movement at one of the potential AVF sites will typify <br />4-238j
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.