My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-07-15_REPORT - M1988044 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1988044
>
2009-07-15_REPORT - M1988044 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:48:47 PM
Creation date
7/16/2009 8:41:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
7/15/2009
Doc Name
Annual Status Report
From
Schmidt Construction Company
To
DRMS
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
production of existing plants is sufficient, but these areas might also require some spot seeding next <br />year or perhaps this fall. <br />All the revegetation areas are continuing to be amazingly free of noxious weeds, although <br />annual weeds are still common in the younger growths. The frightening invasion of Tamarix detected <br />in 2006 has largely been controlled with continued clean up of a few remaining plants. As of the date <br />of this report it is estimated there are only about 50 plants left and very few seedlings have been <br />found. Continued inspection will be necessary though as this species, once established, is very <br />tenacious. The few plants that are left seem to be very determined to remain and seem to be <br />moderately unresponsive to control efforts. Fortunately, none are large plants and that provides an <br />opportunity to physically remove them by simply hacking them out of the ground. <br />The increased moisture in the spring along with the removal of grazing, has continued to <br />benefit the grasslands as well as the lowland areas. Weed density, although still high, is much <br />reduced as a result of the heavily grazed native grasses coming back with strong growth in the last <br />couple of years. The needlegrasses in heavily grazed areas have returned to a high density, and are <br />now the dominant species in many areas. Blue grama in most upland areas is still very strong, but <br />there appears to be shift in the species composition more toward the needlegrass and even some <br />bluestems. Because there is no quantitative data that defines the species frequency distribution during <br />grazing or after, it is hard to say whether the apparent shift in the species is real or an illusion caused <br />robust plants. Although the needlegrasses dominate the view, it is not known whether they are <br />numerically dominant. One thing is clear, though, and that is the productivity of the grasslands has <br />increased remarkably since the removal of grazing and appears to be shifting back somewhat more <br />toward a needlegrass-wheatgrass-bluestem-grama grassland. Of course, this is most likely just a <br />result of the removal of grazing which was utilizing the grasses. It is unlikely that over such a short <br />period of time there has been a great deal of real change in the species frequency distribution curves. <br />But with the large amount of seed that should be produced in 2009 that should eventually translate <br />into a shift in the species frequency distribution. The excellent growth year in 2009 will undoubtedly <br />accelerate this shift. <br />It is important to note that in the 2008 planted areas, one of the most successful species was <br />needlegrass with western wheatgrass and/or blue grama hanging on to a tight second place. This is <br />important because as the undisturbed (by mining) grasslands begin to shift more toward a <br />needlegrass dominance with wheatgrass and grama close subdominants, the revegetation areas seem <br />to be also trending in that direction. In time, this should allow a closer compatibility in the species <br />structure between revegetated areas and undisturbed areas. It will take many years for that to fully <br />develop, but so long as the structure of these two vegetation units trend toward structural <br />convergence then eventually the reclamation should be indistinguishable from the- natural vegetation. <br />The five new exclosures were quantitatively sampled in early fall of 2008. Analysis of the <br />data and comparison to previous data showed very significant gains in growth. The protection of the <br />trees has reaped considerable benefit with woody biomass increasing about 50% as compared to the <br />previous year. The large gains of 2007 were not seen due to the dry summer. In fact, among the older <br />trees along the stream bottom, by the end of August there was considerable dieback of leaves on <br />outer branches and for most of the summer the trees looked somewhat wilted. The wilted appearance <br />declined in September as more moisture arrived, but many outer branches of the old, mature trees <br />were lost. The younger woody growth continued to show the typical instability of an immature <br />growth, but evidence that the willows and cottonwoods were "sorting things out" became apparent <br />with each establishing a moderate degree of zonation typical of mature growths. It is significant that <br />even with the dry summer the woody growth in the new generation remained strong even with the <br />Status report for 2009 due July 15, 2009 Page 2 of 10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.