Laserfiche WebLink
Jun 25 08 08:14a <br />p.3 <br />anticipated affected land in the entire lease of 1,864 acres as shown on Exhibit: C-1 B <br />(Amendment 3) in the Reclamation Permit. <br />To include these changes in the Reclamation Permit, a technical revision would <br />be provided to the Division of Reclamation, Miring and Safety if the Use by Special <br />Review is approved by Arapahoe County. That revision would formalize these: changes <br />and make them a part ofthe Reclamation Permit. At that time, the bonding would also be <br />adjusted to reflect these new acreages. <br />The parties understand that this agreement is necessitated by the compromises <br />necessary to obtain the USR permit, and Schmidt has agreed to these comprormsees <br />without compensation. <br />Mining leas GL 264 remains in full force and effect and only such modifications <br />as outlined above limit the terms of GL 264. Although this compromise reduces the size <br />of the mining area, it does not reduce the acreage of the lease. Schmidt maintains the <br />right to hold or to drop acreages within the lease boundary. <br />The parties below have signatory authority for this agreement. <br />Agre to on June 2008 <br />Scott Da1is, for Schmidt Construction Company <br />Agreed to on June , 2008 <br />r <br />B chi, f r SLB