Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 2. Comparison of leachate pH and specific conductance data (5 minute and 18 hour) for 13 mine-wastes <br />included in this study. <br />Leachate Geochemical Comparisons and Trends for All Sites <br />Following is a brief summary comparing selected leachate geochemistry for all 13 sites. <br />pH and Specific Conductance <br />Figure 2 shows the data and trend lines for all 13 mine-waste leachate samples for pH and specific <br />conductance over time. In this plot, pH data from the 5-minute USGS field leach test are compared to pH <br />data from the 18-hour leach test. Leachate pH values went down over time in leachate produced from the <br />Togo, Arabella, Lower Radical, and Jack Pine mine-waste composites. The lowest pH (3.0) was found in <br />leachate from the Togo mine-waste (located in the upper Snake River watershed). However, the greatest <br />drop in pH over time occurred in the leachate from the Lower Radical mine-waste (upper Deer Creek <br />watershed), which dropped from pH 4.8 in the 5-minute leachate to pH 4.6 after 18 hours (4.2 pH units). <br />Other mine-waste leachates that dropped in pH over time were: Togo (-0.1), Arabella (-0.1), and the Jack <br />Pine (-0.1). The largest increase in pH occurred in leachate from the Santiago mine-waste composite <br />(Leavenworth Creek watershed), which showed a spike in pH from 3.6 after 5 minutes to 5.2 after 18 hours <br />(+1.6 pH units). pH also increased over time in leachate from the Wild Irishman (+1.1), Lower Chatauqua <br />(+0.4), Superior and Cashier (+0.3), Waldorf (+0.2), and the Burke and General Teller (+0.1). The pH in <br />leachate from the Grizzly mine-waste stayed the same over time. <br />pH trends produced from the 5-minute leach test correlated to pH trends produced from the 18- <br />hour leach test. <br />Figure 2 also shows specific conductance data and trends for all 13 mine-waste composites. 18- <br />hour leachate values for specific conductance ranged from 8.78 pS/cm in the General Teller leachate <br />(located in Upper Deer Creek watershed) to 1,730 µS/cm for leachate from the Santiago mine-waste <br />(located in the Leavenworth Creek/Clear Creek watershed). Other leachates with high specific conductance <br />were the Waldorf (located in the Leavenworth Creek/Clear Creek watershed) (1,092 µS/cm), and the Togo <br />(718 µS/cm) (located in the Upper Snake River watershed). <br />Generally, the leachate specific conductance trend line for the 13 leachates corresponded very well <br />to the trend for pH. That is, leachate samples with higher pH had lower specific conductivities and <br />leachates with lower pH values had higher conductivities. Also, the relatively simple 5-minute test does a <br />good job portraying the general trend for specific conductance for these 13 sites. <br />Figure 3. Comparison of leachate sulfate data (5 minute and 18 hour) for 13 mine-wastes included in this study. <br />Sulfate <br />Figure 3 shows the 5-minute and 18-hour leachate sulfate concentration, and the sulfate trend for <br />all 13 sites. Sulfate concentration was generally low (<200 mg/L) at I 1 of the 13 sites. However, the <br />Waldorf and Santiago mine-wastes, located in the Leavenworth Creek/Clear Creek watershed, had much <br />higher sulfate concentration, with 443 mg/L in the 5-minute Waldorf leachate and 736 mg/L sulfate in the <br />5-minute Santiago leachate. <br />Like many of the other geochemical data, sulfate data produced using the simple 5-minute USGS <br />field leach test gives an accurate indication for the sulfate trend produced after 18 hours. This comparison <br />indicates that leachate sulfate trends are fairly predictable and that none of the samples fell out of line or <br />Hageman_SIR_2508.doc 7 7/21/2004 2:50 PM