My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-07-06_REVISION - M1977036 (24)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977036
>
2009-07-06_REVISION - M1977036 (24)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:20:30 PM
Creation date
7/7/2009 12:48:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977036
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
7/6/2009
Doc Name
Stability Analysis
From
Tetra Tech
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Robert Ray <br />June 12, 2009 <br />Page 2 <br />KNOWN STRUCTURES WITHIN 200 FEET OF MINING LIMITS <br />Known man-made structures within 200 feet of the amended area mine limits, excluding those owned <br />by Lafarge, Inc., are listed below: <br />¦ A buried 4" gas flowline owned by DCP Midstream located approximately 150 feet <br />southwest of the southern property line in the southwest corner. <br />¦ A 10' wide recreational trail owned by Weld County, located along the northwestern <br />border. <br />¦ A fence, also owned by Weld County, located at the boundary between the mine and trail <br />corridor. <br />The east and south property lines of the amended area abut the previously permitted mine <br />area. No structures are within 200 feet of the east property line of the mine expansion. <br />STABILITY ANALYSES <br />Stability analyses were performed in order to evaluate potential for damage to existing permanent <br />structures due to mine highwall slope failures. Analyses were performed with the Slope-W 2007 <br />computer program. For each case we analyzed the most critical soil profile(s) based on exploratory <br />boring data (i.e. the tallest highwall, thickest overburden layer, and associated weaker clay lenses). <br />The stability analyses were run in accordance with accepted geotechnical standards and DRMS <br />requirements for temporary pit slopes summarized as follows: <br />• Mine highwalls modeled as vertical slopes <br />• Residual soil strength parameters used for the upper 2.5 feet of weathered bedrock <br />• Factor of Safety must be greater than 1.0 <br />Groundwater levels on the profiles were input to portray site dewatering. <br />No laboratory strength tests were performed on soils at the site. The soil strength parameters used <br />were based on typical values for the anticipated soils and our experience working with DRMS at <br />other sites in the area. The input strength parameters were: <br />Material Moist Unit Saturated Unit Effective Cohesion Effective Friction <br /> Weight c Weight c c Angle (degrees) <br />Overburden clay 114 126 150 28 <br />Sand and gravel 130 137 0 37 <br />Cla Lense 116 119 200 22 <br />Weathered Residual <br /> <br />Strength Bedrock 124 134 0 14 <br />Cla stone Bedrock 124 134 500 22
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.