Laserfiche WebLink
West Elk Mine 2008 Annual Hydrology Report 53 <br />• elevated dissolved iron of 0.02 mg/1 compared to the baseline maximum of 0.01 mg/l, and slightly <br />elevated conductivity of 467.08 µmhos/cm compared to the baseline conductivity of 462 <br />µmhos/cm. The Upper Sylvester Gulch monitoring station is upstream from the mine water <br />discharge points. <br />Data from three sampling rounds plus one duplicate sample (four samples total; extended <br />parameter suite) were collected at Middle Sylvester Gulch in WY 2008. Several parameters in <br />Middle Sylvester Gulch exceeded the maximum baseline values in WY 2008 for one or more of the <br />samples collected: chloride 87.21 and 10.9 mg/1 compared to the baseline maximum of 10 mg/l; <br />conductivity of 1,232.64 and 948.15 µmhos/cm compared to the baseline maximum conductivity of <br />800 µmhos/cm; and hardness of about 312 and 228 mg/1 compared to baseline maximum of 234 <br />mg/l; pH of 8.84 and 8.81 s.u. compared to the baseline maximum of 8.70 s.u. Sulfate and TDS <br />concentrations were above baseline levels for all samples. Sulfate levels ranged from 89.73 to <br />107.02 mg/1 compared to the baseline maximum of 80 mg/l. TDS levels ranged from 608 mg/I to <br />818 mg/l compared to the baseline maximum of 584 mg/l. Data from one sample and a duplicate <br />were collected in Lower Sylvester Gulch in WY 2008. The samples had elevated conductivities of <br />730.5 and 730.34 µmhos/cm compared to the baseline maximum of 597 µmhos/cm; elevated total <br />• iron concentrations of 1.78 and 1.75 mg/1 compared to the baseline maximum of 0.17 mg/I; <br />elevated TDS of 469 and 472 mg/I compared to the baseline maximum of 430 mg/l; and elevated <br />TSS of 171 and 173 mg/1 compared to the baseline maximum of 120 mg/1. It should be noted that <br />water quality in Middle and Lower Sylvester Gulch is affected by mine water discharge that is <br />regulated by MCC's CPDS permit. <br />MCC's mining activity has approached only two perennial streams in the permit area, Minnesota <br />Creek and Deep Creek. Longwall mining operations in the Minnesota Creek drainage area took <br />place from July 1998 to February 2001. There are no baseline data for Upper Minnesota Creek <br />(WWE, 2001). None of the tested parameters for Lower Minnesota Creek exceeded permit or <br />baseline limits in WY 2008. Longwall mining in the Deep Creek drainage began in March 2001. <br />With the exception of dissolved iron, none of the tested parameters for Upper and Lower Deep <br />Creek exceeded the baseline limits in WY 2008. Upper Deep Creek had elevated dissolved iron of <br />0.13 mg/l compared to the baseline value of 0.04 mg/l. The elevated dissolved iron value is not <br />due to mining impacts, but is likely the result of the above normal flows in WY 2008. <br />The water sample from Deep Creek Ditch is collected from a trans-basin diversion ditch that routes <br />• water from the Little Gunnison Creek to Upper Dry Fork and has not been impacted by mining <br />operations. Several water quality measurements above baseline values were observed at the Deep <br />June 2009 HydroGeo, Inc.