Laserfiche WebLink
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br /> Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br /> during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection <br /> and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br /> TRM, designed to direct overflow from above the road and snowdrift melt from below the road into the TRM <br /> channel, and prevent side-cutting erosion. New TRM was installed along the length of the channel, and the <br /> temporary flex pipe was re-set and staked in place. The flex pipe conveys flow out of Culvert PM-11 on the light <br /> use road, to the toe of PM-4D. The installation looks good at this point, and seeded wheat cover crop and some <br /> grasses have recently germinated and are growing up through the TRM. <br /> Along the channel reach immediately downstream of PM-4D, the operator had installed staked willow bundles to <br /> reduce flow velocities and minimize scour, and along one short segment had installed TRM. The short segment <br /> of TRM, approximately 50 yards below the toe of PM-4D, had been undercut by flow from recent storm runoff, <br /> and there is a 2 to 3 foot gully along a 50 foot segment of the drainage in this location. Structures such as <br /> rock checks or aspen log checks placed in series along the eroded segment would appear to be <br /> warranted. <br /> 005 Gulch "Minimal Disturbance"Drainage Segment <br /> Please see the May 2009 inspection report for detailed discussion. <br /> On the 2009 Rill and Gully map, the operator has indicated a proposed drop structure, to be located in the <br /> approximate location of the active headcutting depicted on Photo#8, attached to the May inspection report. The <br /> Division concurs that measures are warranted in this location to prevent progression of the headcut and <br /> associated bank sloughage and erosion (armored drop structure or a riprapped grade transition zone). Similar <br /> measures would appeared to be warranted for the headcut at the fence crossing, (and other potentially <br /> unstable nickpoints, if they occur along the segment). Low keyed check structures would appear to be <br /> warranted along the scoured section depicted in Photo#2 of the May inspection report, to reduce flow <br /> velocities and minimize further incision. <br /> Support Facilities <br /> Some no longer needed facilities have been removed, including several fuel tanks and the bath house trailers <br /> from the shop area, and the old trailer near the aspen plots that formerly housed a RMRS employee during the <br /> summers. <br /> Revegetation <br /> Effective vegetation cover with good diversity, including significant areas of big sagebrush patches, has been <br /> established or is developing in most areas of the 005 and 006 watersheds in the northern portions of the mine, <br /> which include the oldest reclaimed stands. Newer reclaimed stands in the south mine area exhibit lower cover, <br /> and are still subject to accelerated rill and gully erosion across fairly broad areas. The operator has delineated a <br /> few locations in the South Mine area for remedial seeding, due to poor initial establishment(see 2009 Rill and <br /> Gully Map). The steep reclaimed slopes in the Pond 017 watershed of the South Mine area held up well to <br /> snowmelt and rainfall runoff this spring, but there was fairly extensive erosion in the 016 watershed. <br /> Weed control is an on-going aspect of the reclamation operation. Whitetop is still present in various locations, <br /> including areas along the tie across haul road and in the vicinity of Stock Pond T-18. Canada thistle and <br /> houndstongue are still widespread throughout the reclamation area, with dense patches in some locations. <br /> Thistle had recently been sprayed along heavily infested segments of Road "J", and was yellowed and drooping. <br /> 5 <br />