My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_INSPECTION - C1992080 (29)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1992080
>
_INSPECTION - C1992080 (29)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2020 4:22:11 PM
Creation date
7/1/2009 9:59:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992080
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
6/25/2009
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
debris and sediment has been washed into the channel,but the culverts contained little sediment,indicating <br /> no recent significant flow through the culverts. <br /> Sediment control The vegetative cover established on the disturbed areas of the Carbon Junction <br /> Mine appears to be effectively controlling erosion. No significant gullies or sediment fans were found <br /> on the site. Erosion on the disturbed areas of the site appears to be occurring at a rate similar to <br /> adjoining undisturbed lands. The base of the North Pit reclaimed slope is contoured to act as a grass <br /> filter for trapping sediment in runoff coming off of the slope where the south half of the North Pit was <br /> approved as a small area exemption in TR-14. This grass filter terrace was in good condition. <br /> Backfilling and Grading <br /> Backfilling, grading, topsoil replacement, and revegetation appeared to have been completed in all <br /> areas within the permit area except topsoil stockpiles 4 and 7, and boreholes 17-1, 94-1, and 95-1 (the <br /> low areas where collection ditches have been regraded in the area of the gravel pit/coal permit <br /> boundary is being researched). <br /> Support Facilities <br /> No problems were found in the Equipment Storage Area at the south end of the permit area. Equipment <br /> previously stored there was removed from the site in 2008. <br /> Topsoil <br /> Stockpiles 4 and 7 were well-vegetated, were not gullied, and do not have weed problems. Topsoil <br /> replacement depths in the SL-4 bond release area were previously verified during the June 2008 inspection <br /> in the Equipment Storage Area and in the Permanently Reclaimed Spoil Area. Topsoil stockpile depths <br /> for the areas regraded in early 2009 (Pond 1, Pond 2, and collection ditches) were verified during the <br /> March 2009 inspection. Replaced topsoil depths in the North Pit area were observed during topsoil <br /> replacement in 2006 and were found to have more than the one-foot required thickness. <br /> Revegetation <br /> The areas that were backfilled, graded, and topsoiled in early 2009 (ponds and collection ditches)have <br /> recently been seeded and had straw mulch applied. The areas that were backfilled, graded, topsoiled, <br /> seeded, and mulched in summer 2006 had initially developed a nurse crop of sterile wheat/oat hybrid, a <br /> product called Regreen. This grass and others (wheat, orchard,brome, and rye grasses)provide most <br /> of the cover on areas seeded in 2006. <br /> Reclamation Success <br /> As mentioned in the October 2008 inspection report, leaving topsoil stockpiles 4 and 7 as permanent <br /> features on the site would require a Technical Revision to the permit application that demonstrates each <br /> stockpile is not needed for a plant growth medium and each stockpile meets approximate original contour. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.