Laserfiche WebLink
refused to produce the lease and refused to allow the Plaintiff to be a named party to <br />any written lease. <br />14. Subsequently, at an unknown time, the Defendants entered a new and <br />different written lease and back dated the same to August 8, 2005, without the prior <br />knowledge or consent of the Plaintiff and over the Plaintiffs objection to any written <br />lease being entered without its written consent. The new lease is attached and marked <br />Exhibit A. <br />15. In the same time frame and also without the knowledge or consent of Zellitti <br />Properties, Defendant Anthony Zellitti purchased property adjacent to the existing gravel <br />pit (hereinafter the Phillips property) for the purpose of extending the sand and gravel pit <br />into said property and that Anthony Zellitti had continued to pay a small sum in this <br />period to the Plaintiff as a "royalty" when in fact Anthony Zellitti was paying himself a <br />much larger sum from the activities of Hocker Construction on the adjacent property and <br />utilizing the joint tenancy property for milling, storage and transportation from the said <br />Phillips property. <br />. 16. In addition to the above, and also without knowledge or consent of Zellitti <br />Properties, the Defendant, Hocker Construction, L.L.P. began mining sand and gravel <br />• from the existing pit which extended onto other property jointly owned by Anthony Zellitti <br />and Marilyn Zellitti and other relatives of the said Defendants (hereinafter the Barry <br />property) and for which they received a royalty and used the tenancy in common <br />property for milling, storage and ingress and transportation and failed to pay any fee to <br />the Plaintiff for the use of the tenancy in common property owned by Plaintiff. <br />17. Over the objection of the Plaintiff, Anthony Zellitti and Marilyn Zellitti began <br />charging 10% management fee deducted from the royalty payments being paid by <br />Hocker Construction L.L. P, for sand and gravel extracted from the commonly owned <br />property. <br />18. The Plaintiff demanded that the Defendant Hocker Construction L.L.P. pay <br />Plaintiffs' share of royalties directly to the Plaintiff, but the Defendant Anthony Zellitti and <br />Marilyn Zellitti have objected and the Defendant Hocker Construction has steadfastly <br />refused. <br />19. As a result of the above breaches of duty of the Plaintiffs by the Defendants, <br />Anthony Zellitti and Marilyn Zellitti, Plaintiff terminated the management agreement with <br />the Defendants. <br />COUNTI <br />20. All introductory paragraphs 1 through 19 are realleged and incorporated <br />• herein by this reference.