|
• FAX NCI. 873-1742 -Tt-L ". 18 2005 0 1PM Pc3
<br />rLE 2 Uf 3
<br />sagree.
<br />In forcible entry and detf?.incr prcticccdiz3.gs, the Cc3,10orada TtLiles of Civil Yroceclurc apply urnlesos
<br />spresssly provic4ca-d otherwise, See § 13--44---1.19, 4..P--S. l4crc, the trial court had ex-tendcd the time in
<br />hic l tlzc u.za.ciertakings were to be filed. C. R. C.P. 6(b). T'h.us, the Lzrtciertakings were: properly filed
<br />ithin- the: 0xten.cled •pcriocl granted by the trial cour. t.
<br />11
<br />Uzz appeal, dcfend?int contends that fa. C:I-tcTlclllt is without az_atlzarity to xx?air?tain an rj.c: i_ic7r1 far
<br />co-tci?aizts.
<br />?ssscssiozz c),-F rood property withoLit tl-10 eon.sent of all
<br />CUur rule c7n Wllether a ca-tevtarit may lJIriizg an action to rec-c?vcr rEal'pr.c7perty is su.cClil tly stat:ecl ilz
<br />'ur Z., cars v. A-AcIVe ilf 1 14 Colo. 78, 1 6?- e.2d 226 (1945):
<br />I"[T]a-i an action to rccovcr real property, oz?e Conant in cc?n?inoti mazy recc?vcr passes-'ion of
<br />the es?tirc:. tract as against all pcrsonn; c'xcEpt 1?is co-tcna.nts____' 'Thc right tc> --,Lie far dazzzazgc-s,
<br />as well us - c7r possession, by a tl:.nau1t i." eomIllUn would sce.uvt to be proper."
<br />'Isis rule is in record with the weight of authority. 4 Cy_ Thol??pscasz, RE-cxx t'r-n??c.pty §5 1816 and 1519
<br />1 975 Kcpl _ V c71. ). '1'hti?.s, plainti-f.7f5s were prc3y3or p"rti t-- s to ixinintkLi ri
<br />_._.... .... ..................................._.,.,.,...,...,,................_....,.......,........?.,...._............... Pages 1330 .......... ..... .......... .......... .... ..................
<br />.......................... ............ ....._....._..........,.,..........
<br />zis act1011 as dcfend.rxt?.t is a 1eg31, entity, separate 1'rc7rra t1 1e cc?-czwncrs of th.e stixl7jcet prapcz-ty.
<br />Iii
<br />De{=enclant a.isc.), contends that the ?zc7ticc furnished by plaiiztif -s was ciet"cctive as it vvas -uantizzzely, and
<br />t failed tc? jcd-ja the cc),tomaints c7f'the SvLbject property as ccy-lessors. We disagree.
<br />-FII,c lease iyzvolveci is for c'1 term certain. It containcd. axn i-nitial term o d, two years, with tin option UcYr
<br />uz ei,gl-it yc.-cxr extension. As such, a notice LCI, quit is not rc:quirecl. S?-ctioEl 13--40--107(4), C:. R.S.
<br />I7efen.cIant's rellaiicE oiz ."i-v v. 139 Cc?1o. 457', 340 P.2d 438 (1959) is nzi5placed. The Ildac
<br />j ie is entitled to _jtld.gn?crit oizl.y to
<br />icci +ion held that wlZere a co-lessor fails to tlzc other Cc7-lessors, l
<br />hE extent of his i.ntcrest in. the subject prc>perty. Ilere, the _j?xclgrnezzt for licy sscssicru anc3 dfaz-JzLmLges wu.:ti
<br />,xpre:SSly lil7.7i tEd to the extent cf plai.r?tif 's' i?.ic:rest i.n ilzc subject proper. ty .
<br />IV
<br />C?ontrar•y to plaintiffs' conten.tic-31-ks, th.G trial cc-3,Lart properly decliizcd to award attc-)rYZcy's fees ba.5ed
<br />..apo*" t7-lc unl. iwiul deterztion action LIS sLZ.ch Liz-1 award woL?ld be a dermal of eclLlal protectiorn. M. care v.
<br />Tiyhnsorx, 193 Colc-. 489, 568 1>.2d 437 (1977). 1~urtlaermore, Lander the facts uX this cLtse, the trial coLirt
<br />did i?ot c?rJ- in r4fcisiz-Ig to asnscss attc}rtiey's fees pursuant tcy § 13-17-101., C.fZ.S. (1 cJ83 C.um.Supp.).
<br />V
<br />L:i.tizzg ,Strcri?ss v. 733"cxXt°r'gl-zt, 160 Cold. 581, 41 S P.2d 878 (1 966), PIELirttiffs also coxltevid that they
<br />were entitled tc> postjLLClgr-n.atzt da.m.agcs ir? tlic ;,x ncount c74' 45% of $5,C?OU per. z?aotzth, vcrhicl?. they crantei.?.
<br />lztto://wv?nv.1.4swriter.nEt/cgi-Painltexi5/welo/caselcaw/+k.c.-)t cc 121za.wBmcOC?i5co1Z'Wxww-.x IF 7V'... 7/15/2t3t
|