Laserfiche WebLink
Issues Raised by the Objecting Parties <br />Issues raised by the objecting parties are represented by italicized bold print. The Division's <br />response to the objection issues follows in standard print. <br />Herein, all references to the Act and Rules refer to the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act for <br />the Extraction of Construction Materials, 34-32.5-101 et seg., C.R.S. (the Act), and to the Mineral <br />Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for thE, Extraction of <br />Construction Materials (the Rules). Copy of the current Act and Rules are available on the <br />Division's web site at www.mining.state.co.us. <br />1. The Southern Ute Indian Tribe's Environmental Programs Division notes that <br />a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit be obtained from the EPA <br />and that a storm water plan be included. Second, that the EPA and Army Corps of <br />Engineers be consulted regarding "water of the USA" and the potential for pollution <br />of the streams and wetlands in the area and whether or not a USEPA Discharge <br />Permit is required. (Mr. Mathew J. Box, Chairman, Southern Ute Indian Tribe) <br />On March 24, 2009, the Division provided notice of the 112 application to the following agencies: <br />• Board of Supervisors, La Plata Conservation District; <br />• Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Air Pollution Control Division; <br />• Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Water Quality Control Division; <br />• Colorado Division of Wildlife, Southwest Regional Wildlife Manager; <br />• Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources; <br />• Department of Natural Resources, State Board of Land Commissioners; <br />• La Plata County Planning Department, Planning Director; <br />• La Plata County Commissioners; <br />• Office Archeology & Historical Preservation, Colorado Historical Society; and <br />• US Army Corps of Engineers, Durango Regulatory Field Office. <br />Therefore, the US Army Corps of Engineers and the Water Quality Control Division of the CDPHE <br />were consulted. The Division did not receive response from the US Army Corps of Engineers or <br />from the Water Quality Control Division of the CDPHE. <br />The US Army Corps of Engineers were involved with the review of the original 111 permit and the <br />original permit was modified to address wetland issues. As noted above, the boundary of <br />affected lands for the new 112 application is unchanged from the 111 permit and no new ground <br />will be affected. Operations conducted under the proposed 112 permit are not expected to <br />impact wetlands in addition to those previously addressed by the US Army Corps of Engineers. <br />The Applicant has clarified that the complete file for the original 111 operation is included in the <br />new 112 application. Therefore, requirements placed on the original 111 operation by the US <br />Army Corps of Engineers are included in the proposed 112 operation. <br />The mining activity conducted under the original 111 permit extended below the, water table and <br />exposed ground water, resulting in the approximate five acre pond that currently exists. <br />2