My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-06-18_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981018
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2009-06-18_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2020 12:11:52 PM
Creation date
6/22/2009 11:04:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/18/2009
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for RN5
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
be siphoned into the cracks. The permittee predicted that the sediment <br />accumulating in the cracks and clay in the overburden would ultimately seal <br />the tension cracks from the surface inflow. <br />Continued monitoring of Red Wash has confirmed the permittee's <br />predictions. As projected, subsidence in Red Wash initially resulted in water <br />ponding in the stream-bottom. The high content of silt and clay carried by <br />Red Wash rapidly fills these stream-bottom ponds and seals any cracks that <br />formed in the alluvium as a result of the subsidence. Water continues to flow <br />in the surface channel at Red Wash while piezometric levels in the basal <br />alluvial gravel have dropped, indicating that the basal alluvium is not <br />recharged by surface flow infiltration. <br />Minimal subsidence impacts are expected in Scullion Gulch, similar to those <br />observed in Red Wash. The overburden under Scullion Gulch is less than <br />that of Red Wash. Tension cracks could cause several stock ponds in <br />Scullion Gulch basin. to lose impounded water. Although the stock ponds are <br />normally dry, a loss of water could occur where water is present as a result of <br />damage to the dams or pond bottom that would allow seepage loss. Prior to <br />the advancement of mining that could potentially impact the ponds, <br />monitoring is required to be initiated, and the ponds repaired or replaced by <br />the operator if water retention capability of the ponds is diminished due to <br />subsidence. The operator will haul water for stock in the event of pond repair <br />or construction. <br />2. Ground Water Impacts <br />The impact of the proposed mine on ground water will be localized, with no <br />significant impact expected on a regional basis. This is due primarily to the <br />small quantity of ground water in. the area. <br />Water encountered within the mine will be utilized underground for dust <br />suppression. As a result, only those inflows that temporarily exceed storage <br />capacities and mine use requirements would potentially be discharged to the <br />surface and lost from the ground water system. Pumping from approved <br />mine water discharge locations ceased upon the sealing of the D seam <br />northern longwall district in 1996). Although dewatering could be <br />accomplished by installation of a submersible pump, dewatering is not <br />currently anticipated. If mine water discharge were to occur, there would be <br />no loss to the hydrologic system, being that ground water in the area is <br />tributary to the White River. <br />Since January of 1997, prep plant thickener water has been disposed <br />underground within down-dip, sealed sections of the D seam mine. No <br />discernible effects on surface water or ground water quality are anticipated, <br />although water levels will be reestablished sooner than would otherwise be <br />the case. <br />Deserado Mine 34 June 18, 2009
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.