My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-06-12_HYDROLOGY - M2001017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M2001017
>
2009-06-12_HYDROLOGY - M2001017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:47:39 PM
Creation date
6/15/2009 9:24:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001017
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
6/12/2009
Doc Name
Substitute Water Supply Plan
From
OSE
To
JR Engineering
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Brian Leavesley <br />June 9, 2009 <br />Page 4 <br />11. All diversions shall be measured in a manner acceptable to the division engineer. The <br />Applicant shall install and maintain such measuring devices as required by the division <br />engineer for operation of this SWSP. <br />12. All releases of replacement water must be sufficient to cover all out of priority depletions <br />and be made under the direction and/or approval of the water commissioner. The <br />replacement may be aggregated to maximize beneficial use. The water commissioner <br />and/or division engineer shall determine the rate and timing of an aggregated release. <br />13. The approval of this substitute water supply plan does not relieve the Applicant and/or <br />landowner of the requirement to obtain a Water Court decree approving a permanent <br />plan for augmentation or mitigation to ensure the permanent replacement of all <br />depletions, including long-term evaporation losses and lagged depletions after gravel <br />mining operations have ceased. If reclamation of the mine site will produce a permanent <br />water surface xposing grourOwa er to evaporatio aan pp iPcatiowfbr a-p lw fo --- <br />augmentation must be filed with the Division 1 Water Court at least three (3) years prior <br />to the completion of mining to include, but not be limited to, long-term evaporation losses <br />and lagged depletions. If a lined pond results after reclamation, replacement of lagged <br />depletions shall continue until there is no longer an effect on stream flow. <br />11. Dewatering at the pits will produce delayed depletions to the stream system. As long as <br />the pit is continuously dewate:red, the water returned to the stream system should be <br />adequate to offset the depletions caused by dewatering. However, once dewatering at <br />the site ceases, the delayed depletions must be addressed. At least three years prior to <br />completion of mining, a plan must be submitted that specifies how the post pumping <br />dewatering depletions (including refilling of the pit) will be replaced in time, place and <br />amount. <br />14. This substitute water supply plan may be revoked or modified at any time should it be <br />determined that injury to other water rights has or will occur as a result of this plan. <br />Should this substitute water supply plan expire without renewal or be revoked prior to <br />adjudication of a permanent plan for augmentation, all excavation of product from below <br />the water table, and all other use of water at the pit, must cease immediately. <br />15. In accordance with amendments to §25-8-202(7), C.R.S., and Senate Bill 89-181 Rules <br />and Regulations adopted on February 4, 1992, the State Engineer shall determine <br />whether the substitute supply, is of a quality to meet requirements.of use to senior <br />appropriators. As such, water quality data or analysis may be requested at any time to <br />determine if the water quality is appropriate for downstream water users. <br />16. The decision of the state engineer shall have no precedential or evidentiary force, shall <br />not create any presumptions, shift the burden of proof, or serve as a defense in any water <br />court case or any other legal action that may be initiated concerning the substitute water <br />supply plan.. This decision shall not bind the State Engineer to act in a similar manner in <br />any other applications involving other plans or in any proposed renewal of this plan, and <br />shall not imply concurrence with any findings of fact or conclusions of law contained <br />herein, or with the engineering methodologies used by the Applicant.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.