My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-06-06_INSPECTION - M2009023
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M2009023
>
2009-06-06_INSPECTION - M2009023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:47:23 PM
Creation date
6/12/2009 8:14:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009023
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
6/6/2009
Doc Name
Inspection report
From
DRMS
To
Skanska USA Civil West RMD
Inspection Date
5/15/2009
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-2009-023 <br />INSPECTION DATE 5/15/09 <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS WHE <br />This inspection occurred as part of the Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (the Division <br />or DRMS) review process of an application to change the existing 111 type permit (M-1999-086) to a 112 <br />type permit (M-2009-023). The conversion to the 112 permit will remove the sales restriction of the 111 <br />permit and thereby allow the Operator to sell mined materials commercially. The 112 application <br />addresses the same 25 acre area permitted to the 111 operation and the permit boundary will not be <br />altered; no new affected lands will result from the change in type of permit. Four photos and a <br />reclamation cost estimation totaling $90,746 accompany this report. <br />As shown in the photos, a pond resulted from the 111 operation. The existing pond was estimated at five <br />acres surface area. Permit records include a correspondence from the Division Engineer of Water <br />Division 7, Division of Water Resources (DWR), dated January 3, 2002, which indicates the pond is <br />compliant with Colorado water laws and regulations governing injury to existing water rights. In its April 3, <br />2009 response to the Division's notice of the. 112 application, DWR reiterated that the operation is <br />compliant with Colorado water rights laws, clarified that future operations will not impact surface water <br />rights, and recommended approval of the 112 application. Therefore, the existing operation and the <br />activities proposed in the 112 application appear compliant with the requirements of Rule 3.1.6(1)(a). <br />In response to objections to the 112 application, received from Mr. Harry Goff and the Southern Ute <br />Indian Tribe, the Operator reiterated that additional ground water shall not be exposed. The pit will be <br />dry-mined and dewatering of the pit will not be necessary. On-site material processing for the 112 <br />operation will be limited to crushing and screening. Therefore, the operation will not discharge pit <br />drainage or process water and a discharge permit will not be required for the 112 operation. On March <br />24, 2009, the Division provided notice to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, <br />Water Quality Control Division (WQCD), of the 112 application. The Division has not received response <br />from the WQCD. <br />NOTE: The original 111 operation mined below the water table and discharged pit drainage and <br />process water. Therefore, a Colorado Discharge Permit System permit was required through the WQCD. <br />As noted above, the 112 operation will not discharge pit drainage or process water. <br />As shown in the photos, the existing pit area exhibits internal drainage. In the original 111 permit the <br />Operator committed to construct stormwater detainment berms and/or silt fence to treat stormwater <br />runoff for sediment prior to leaving the site. The Operator has clarified that such commitments to control <br />stormwater also apply to the new 112 permit. Therefore, stormwater discharge from the site appears <br />unlikely. However, in response to an objection to the 112 application from the Southern Ute Indian Tribe, <br />the Operator has committed to obtaining a stormwater permit through the EPA.. <br />In their objection to the 112 application, the Southern Ute Indian Tribe also indicated that US Army Corps <br />of Engineers should be consulted regarding potential impacts to waters of the USA and wetland areas. <br />On March 24, 2009, the Division provided notice to the US Army Corps of Engineers of the 112 <br />application. The Division has not received response from the US Army Corps of Engineers. However, <br />the US Army Corps of Engineers were involved with the original 111 application and the application was <br />modified to address the requirements of the US Army Corps of Engineers. As noted above, the permit <br />boundary for the 112 application is the same as the 111 operation and no new ground will be affected by <br />the 112 operation. Therefore, the 112 application appears compliant with the requirements of the US
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.