Laserfiche WebLink
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-2009-023 <br />INSPECTION DATE 5/15/09 <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS WHE <br />This inspection occurred as part of the Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (the Division <br />or DRMS) review process of an application to change the existing 111 type permit (M-1999-086) to a 112 <br />type permit (M-2009-023). The conversion to the 112 permit will remove the sales restriction of the 111 <br />permit and thereby allow the Operator to sell mined materials commercially. The 112 application <br />addresses the same 25 acre area permitted to the 111 operation and the permit boundary will not be <br />altered; no new affected lands will result from the change in type of permit. Four photos and a <br />reclamation cost estimation totaling $90,746 accompany this report. <br />As shown in the photos, a pond resulted from the 111 operation. The existing pond was estimated at five <br />acres surface area. Permit records include a correspondence from the Division Engineer of Water <br />Division 7, Division of Water Resources (DWR), dated January 3, 2002, which indicates the pond is <br />compliant with Colorado water laws and regulations governing injury to existing water rights. In its April 3, <br />2009 response to the Division's notice of the. 112 application, DWR reiterated that the operation is <br />compliant with Colorado water rights laws, clarified that future operations will not impact surface water <br />rights, and recommended approval of the 112 application. Therefore, the existing operation and the <br />activities proposed in the 112 application appear compliant with the requirements of Rule 3.1.6(1)(a). <br />In response to objections to the 112 application, received from Mr. Harry Goff and the Southern Ute <br />Indian Tribe, the Operator reiterated that additional ground water shall not be exposed. The pit will be <br />dry-mined and dewatering of the pit will not be necessary. On-site material processing for the 112 <br />operation will be limited to crushing and screening. Therefore, the operation will not discharge pit <br />drainage or process water and a discharge permit will not be required for the 112 operation. On March <br />24, 2009, the Division provided notice to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, <br />Water Quality Control Division (WQCD), of the 112 application. The Division has not received response <br />from the WQCD. <br />NOTE: The original 111 operation mined below the water table and discharged pit drainage and <br />process water. Therefore, a Colorado Discharge Permit System permit was required through the WQCD. <br />As noted above, the 112 operation will not discharge pit drainage or process water. <br />As shown in the photos, the existing pit area exhibits internal drainage. In the original 111 permit the <br />Operator committed to construct stormwater detainment berms and/or silt fence to treat stormwater <br />runoff for sediment prior to leaving the site. The Operator has clarified that such commitments to control <br />stormwater also apply to the new 112 permit. Therefore, stormwater discharge from the site appears <br />unlikely. However, in response to an objection to the 112 application from the Southern Ute Indian Tribe, <br />the Operator has committed to obtaining a stormwater permit through the EPA.. <br />In their objection to the 112 application, the Southern Ute Indian Tribe also indicated that US Army Corps <br />of Engineers should be consulted regarding potential impacts to waters of the USA and wetland areas. <br />On March 24, 2009, the Division provided notice to the US Army Corps of Engineers of the 112 <br />application. The Division has not received response from the US Army Corps of Engineers. However, <br />the US Army Corps of Engineers were involved with the original 111 application and the application was <br />modified to address the requirements of the US Army Corps of Engineers. As noted above, the permit <br />boundary for the 112 application is the same as the 111 operation and no new ground will be affected by <br />the 112 operation. Therefore, the 112 application appears compliant with the requirements of the US