Laserfiche WebLink
Laboratories, Inc. <br />2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 <br />Kerr Coal Company ACZ Project ID: L53815 <br />L53815At WG798090 Potassium, tlissolvetl M200.7 ICP M4 One spike recovery was outsitle of the acceptance limits; <br /> the duplicate spike recovery and the RPD were within the <br /> acceptance limits. <br />Sodium, tlissolved M200.7 ICP M4 One spike recovery was outside of the acceptance limits; <br /> the duplicate spike recovery and the RPD were within the <br /> ' acceptance limits. <br />WG798080 Nitrate/Nitrite as N, dissolved M353.2 -Automated Cadmium HC Initial analysis within holding lime. Reanalysis was past <br /> Reduction holding time which was required tlue to a OC failure during <br /> the initial analysis. <br />WG198740 Sulfate M378.3 -Gravimetric RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was no[ evaluatetl <br /> because the sample concentration is less than 10x the MDL <br />L53815-02 WG198090 Potassium, tlissolved M200.71CP MA One spike recovery was outside of the acceptance limits; <br /> the duplicate spike recovery antl the RPD were within the <br /> acceptance limits. <br />Sodium, dissolved M200.7 ICP M4 One spike recovery was outside of the acceptance limits; <br /> the duplicate spike recovery and the RPD were within the <br /> acceptance limits. <br />WG198080 Nitrate/Nitrite as N, dissolvetl M353.2 -AUtomatetl Cadmium HC Initial analysis within holding time. Reanalysis was past <br /> Reduction holtling time which was required due to a OC failure during <br /> the initial analysis. <br />WG798740 Sulfate M378.3 -Gravimetric RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not evaluated <br /> because the sample concenraticn is less than 10x Ne MDL <br />L$391$-03 WG198090 Potassium, dissolved M200.7 ICP MA One spike recovery was outside of the acceptance IImItS; <br /> the duplicate spike recovery and the RPD were within the <br /> acceptance IimiLS. <br />Sodium, dissolved M200.71CP M4 One spike recovery was outsitle of the acceptance limits; <br /> the duplicate spike recovery and the RPD were within the <br /> acceptance limits. <br />WG798080 Nitrate/NiUite as N, dissolved M353.2 - Automatetl Cadmium HC Initial analysis within holding time. Reanaysis was past <br /> Reduction holding time which was required due to a QQ failure during <br /> the initial analysis. <br />WG198740 Sulfate M375.3 - Gravimetrb RA Relative Percent Dilference (RPD) was not evaluated <br /> because the sample cencentration is less than 70x the MDL <br />L53815-84 WG198090 Potassium, dissolved M200.71CP M4 One spike recovery was outsitle of the acceptance limits; <br /> the duplicate spike recovery and the RPD were wiNin the <br /> acceptance limits. <br />Sotlium, dissolved M200.7 ICP M4 One spike rewvery was outside of the acceptance limits; <br /> the duplicate spike recovery and the RPD were within the <br /> acceptance limits. <br />WG198080 Nitrate/Nitrite as N, dissolvetl M383.2 -Automated Cadmium HC Initial analysis within holding time. Reanalysis was past <br /> Retludion holding time which was required due to a OC failure tludng <br /> the initial analysis. <br />Nitrite as N, dissolvetl M353.2 -Automated Cadmium HC Initial analysis within holding time. Reanaysis was past <br /> Reduction holding ume which was required due to a OC failure during <br /> the initial analysis. <br />WG198740 Sulfate M375.3 -Gravimetric RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not evaluated <br /> because Ne sample concentration is less than 10x the MDL <br />L53818-OS WG798090 Potassium, tlissolved M200.7 IGP M4 One spike recovery was outside of the acceptance limits; <br /> the duplicate spike recovery and the RPD were within the <br /> acceptance limits. <br />WG198080 NltratelNiMte as N, dissolved M353.2 -Automated Cadmium HC Initial analysis within holding time. Reanalysis was past <br /> Retlucticn holding time which was requiretl due to a OC failure during <br /> the initial analysis. <br />Nitrite as N, dissolvetl M353.2 - Automatetl Catlmium HC Initial analysis within holding time. Reanalysis was past <br /> Reduction holding time which was required due to a OC failure dutlng <br /> the initial analysis. <br />REPAD.18.06.05.01 <br />L53815: Page 11 of 17 <br />