My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-06-08_REVISION - M1997032 (25)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1997032
>
2009-06-08_REVISION - M1997032 (25)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:20:25 PM
Creation date
6/10/2009 9:27:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997032
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/8/2009
Doc Name
EPP (AM-01) Attachment E,F,G,H,I, and J (part 7)
From
Denison Mines
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 2 <br />Drainage Control Design <br />• CDM used the UDFCD Drainage Criteria (UDFCD 2005) to calculate flow velocity to <br />determine the appropriate channel lining for the diversion channel. UDFCD (2005) <br />recommends flow velocity be less than 5 ft/sec for grass-lined channels and less than <br />12 ft/sec for riprap channels. Based on these recommendations, a Manning's n value <br />of 0.035 was selected for design calculations to check the capacity of grass-lined <br />channels. <br />The calculated channel depth and velocity of the diversion channel are shown in <br />Table 2-3. CDM recommends adding 2 feet of freeboard to the calculated flow depth <br />to account for potential channel overtopping. Therefore, a design depth of 3.5 feet is <br />recommended for the diversion channel. Based on UDFCD criteria, CDM <br />recommends grass-lined channel for the diversion channel since the flow velocity is <br />less than 5 ft/ sec. <br />Table 2.3 Calculation Summa for Diversion Channel <br />h Freeboard Design Depth <br />(ft) I V <br />ft/sec <br />1.45 2 3.45 3.04 <br />2.4.2 Berm Design <br />CDM designed earthen berms to capture and retain surface water runoff from Basins <br />2 and 3. Runoff in Basin 2 will be captured by a berm along the crest of the DRA. <br />i• Runoff in Basin 3 will be captured by a berm along the toe of the DRA (refer to <br />Exhibits A and B). The berms were designed to contain runoff from the 100-year, <br />24-hour storm event. The point precipitation frequency estimate for the 100-year, <br />24-hour storm, obtained from NOAA Atlas 2, Volume 3 for Colorado (NOAA 1973) is <br />3.0 inches (refer to Appendix B). CDM used the SCS runoff equation to estimate <br />runoff from the 3.0 inches of rainfall. The SCS runoff equation is: <br />Q - (P - 0.2S)2 <br />(P+0.as) <br />where: <br />Q = runoff (in) <br />P = rainfall (in) <br />S = potential maximum retention after runoff begins (in) <br />S is related to the soil and cover conditions of the watershed through the Curve <br />Number (CN). CN has a range of 0 to 100, and S is related to CN by: <br /> <br /> <br />2-3 <br />TA64986-Denison MineslTask Order I - Sunday Mines Drainage StudAVan 4 Mine Drainage Study\Report%V-4 Mine Drainage Report.dm
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.