My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-05-19_REVISION - M1977285 (31)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977285
>
2009-05-19_REVISION - M1977285 (31)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:39:02 PM
Creation date
5/28/2009 7:48:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977285
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/19/2009
Doc Name
EPP (AM-03) Att. P: Drainage; Att. Q: SWMP Repair; Att. R: Rock & Soil Characterization (part 10)
From
Denison Mines
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM3
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Christy Woodward <br />July 31, 2008 <br />Page 9 <br />Neutralization potential is estimated by adding a known quantity of hydrochloric acid to the <br />sample followed by titration of the solution back to a pH of 8.3. The quantity of remaining <br />acid is estimated based on the amount of sodium hydroxide necessary to raise the pH back to <br />a value of 8.3. The quantity of acid consumed by the sample is the neutralization potential, <br />which is estimated by difference and expressed in units of tons per kiloton calcium carbonate <br />equivalent (t/kt CaCO3 eq). <br />In interpretation of ABA analyses, acidity produced by one mole of pyrite is assumed to be <br />neutralized by 2 moles of calcite, which results in a stoichiometric conversion factor of 31.25 <br />t/kt CaCO3 eq. per percent pyritic sulfur. This allows both the acid potential and <br />neutralization potential of a rock to be expressed in equal units of t/kt CaCO3 eq. However, <br />the acid generation and neutralization reactions used in the ABA interpretation are not <br />unique. Therefore, interpretation of ABA analyses is commonly based on empirically derived <br />thresholds. These thresholds are based on the difference between the acid potential and <br />neutralization potential, referred to as net neutralization potential (NNP), and/or the ratio <br />between the neutralization potential and the neutralization potential (NP:AP ratio). <br />Commonly applied thresholds for interpretation of ABA data include the following: <br />¦ NNP values relative to the potential to generate acid in the future: <br />• ¦ <0 t/kt CaCOs eq. indicates a high potential. <br />n 0 to 20 t/kt CaCO3 eq. indicates an uncertain potential. <br />¦ >20 t/kt CaCO3 eq. indicates an unlikely potential. <br />a NP:AP relative to the potential to generate acid in the future: <br />¦ <1 indicates a high potential. <br />a 1 to 2 indicates a moderate potential. <br />a 2 to 4 indicates a low potential. <br />a >4 indicates unlikely potential. <br />These thresholds are used along with evaluation of mineralogical data in order to classify the <br />potential for the source material to generate acid in the future. <br />Potential for Constituents to be Mobilized from Development Rock <br />The potential for development rock to be toxic-forming is a critical concern. Some mine rocks <br />have the propensity to cause problematic mine drainage, which contains elevated <br />concentrations of problematic constituents but is not acidic. Examples of constituents that <br />E <br />0:%4%6 - Denison%Task Order 3 - DMO Sampling and Analysis Plan%Task 3.1 - Sal Ore Rock Data Collection plan%Fhal Denison Sunday Mines Group Soil Ore Rock Data <br />Collection Work Plan.doc
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.