Laserfiche WebLink
Hydrogeological Evaluation of Sunday Mines Group <br />Geologic and Hydrologic Conditions <br />. As discussed in Section 2.3.3, groundwater generally flows westerly from the areas of <br />surface disturbance towards the Dolores River. Therefore, the gradient can be <br />estimated by comparing the elevation of groundwater observed in exploration drill <br />holes at the Carnation/ Sunday and Topaz Mines with the elevation of the Dolores <br />River at potential groundwater discharge points in Big Gypsum Valley. Exhibit 2-3 <br />shows the observed groundwater elevations at the Carnation/ Sunday Mine and <br />Topaz Mine affected areas and the potential discharge point at the Dolores River, the <br />distance from the mines to the potential discharge points, and the estimated hydraulic <br />gradients. The distance used in this estimate is the direct line of site distance between <br />the mine affected areas and the Salt Wash Member outcrops along the Dolores River <br />in. Big Gypsum Valley. This provides a conservative estimate of the hydraulic <br />gradient, because the actual groundwater flow paths are likely longer than assumed. <br />In addition, groundwater may be compartmentalized within relatively isolated fault <br />blocks in some areas, which would affect the actual groundwater flow rate. <br />Additional information regarding the exploration drilling program is presented in <br />Appendix A. <br />r7vti;h;f ?-I Fcfimnfvd hudmulic aradivttt <br />• <br />Mine Observed Elevation of Distance from Estimated <br /> Groundwater Potential Mine to Hydraulic <br /> Elevation Discharge Potential Gradient <br /> (feet) Point Discharge (feet) <br /> (feet) Point <br /> feet <br />Carnation/ West 5,490 5,360 20;431 0.006 <br />Sunda <br />Topaz 5,403 5,360 10,582 0.004 <br />The porosity of the sandstone is unknown; however, Freeze and Cherry (1979) <br />describe an empirical relationship developed by Chilinger (1963), which allows <br />estimation of sandstone porosity based on the textural classification and the intrinsic <br />permeability. Craig et al. (1955) describe the texture of Salt Wash Member sandstone <br />as ranging from fine grained to medium grained, which is supported by visual <br />observations collected during the course of this investigation. Based on the empirical <br />relationship developed by Chilinger (1963) and the intrinsic permeability data <br />provided by Jobim (1962), the porosity of the Salt Wash member sandstones is <br />estimated to range from approximately 11 to 14 percent. In this estimation of average <br />linear groundwater velocity, this estimated porosity is assumed to be equivalent to <br />the estimated effective porosity of the Salt Wash member sandstones. <br />Groundwater observed in the West Sunday and Topaz Mines occurs within the Salt <br />Wash member of the Morrison Formation. A hydraulic conductivity of 1.1 x 10-4 <br />centimeters per second (cm/ sec.) is estimated for this unit based on intrinsic <br />CM 2-18 <br />T:\64986-Denison Mines\Task Older 3 - DMO Sampling and Analysis Plan\Task 3.14 - Hydrogeology Repodl8nal sunday hydro reporNextTINAL Sunday Hydrogeology Report.doc