My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-05-19_REVISION - M1978039HR (32)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1978039
>
2009-05-19_REVISION - M1978039HR (32)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:18:35 PM
Creation date
5/27/2009 2:39:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978039HR
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/19/2009
Doc Name
EPP (AM-01) SWMP Appendix D,E,F & G: Att. G,H,I: County; Att. J,K: BLM (part 7)
From
Denison Mines
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Z The degree to which the proposed action and alternatives affect public health or <br />safety. <br />There is already an existing mine in operation at the site. No public health issues <br />associated with that mine were identified during the course of our analysis. This <br />expansion is an action that is typical of mining operations. Although some broad public <br />health and safety concerns were raised during the public comment period, Denison's <br />operations must be in compliance with all applicable Federal and State regulations for the <br />health and safety of mine workers, and the general public. I see no compelling reason to <br />not accept compliance with all applicable Federal and State standards and agencies as <br />adequately protective of public health. Compliance will include, but not be limited to, <br />agencies and standards such as: the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air <br />Pollutants, the Mine Safety and Health Administration, the Ambient Air Quality <br />Standards, and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. <br />Related to traffic and access, Denison will continue to work with San Miguel County and <br />the Colorado Department of Transportation. <br />3. Unique characteristics of the geographic area. <br />There are no unique characteristics present in the area of the proposed action, which is a <br />relatively small expansion of an existing and operating mine. The vegetation, wildlife, <br />and landforms present in the analysis area are typical of the area. Section 8.2.1 of the EA <br />• does discuss the proximity of the Sunday Mines Complex to the proposed Big Gypsum <br />Valley Area of Critical Environmental Concern. However, it was concluded that the <br />proposal would not affect the proposed ACEC. <br />There are no prime and unique farmlands, wild and scenic rivers, ACEC's, wilderness or <br />wilderness study areas, wetlands, riparian areas or floodplains affected by the proposal. <br />4. The degree to which the effects on the human environment are likely to be highly <br />controversial. <br />During the comment period on the Plan of Operations (POO) for the proposed action, and <br />the preliminary Environmental Assessment there were no substantial concerns that were <br />raised within the scientific community about the effects of the proposed action that would <br />indicate that the effects of the proposed action are likely to be highly controversial. <br />5. The degree to which the possible effects on the human environment are highly <br />uncertain or involve unique or unknown risks. <br />The effects of the proposed action on the human environment are not highly uncertain, <br />nor do they involve unique or unknown risks. Mining is a routine activity, consistent <br />with established uses of the land, and its effects on the human environment have been <br />studied for decades. <br />• <br />Sunday Mines Expansion -3- Dolores Public Lands Office <br />Finding of No Significant Impact January 30, 2009
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.