|
s ?
<br />t
<br />CaVe? Factor `r'C1, round covered by
<br />related to the percent of the g e
<br />and the ""C factor is directly uch as root mass can also b
<br />Fog rangeland and pastoral
<br />t is resent. Subsu?ace effects s vet of 25°?o will
<br />nd the type of vegetation tha p baceous lams with a live co
<br />vegetation a 'on is im octant because her p
<br />etati p .where the cover iS primarily
<br />considered. The type of veg
<br />at contains an equal cover but
<br />it much better than a site th
<br />protect the so
<br />com riled of trees or shrubs • wn of ? the
<br />p
<br />f erence area, the saver break o
<br />aimed area and the sageb?sh re
<br />m the 1999 study of the reel
<br />Fro
<br />eminent areas is given below ? .
<br />p
<br />eference area -1999 Cover ]data
<br />Sagebrush r
<br />4 ercent rock fragments, 2
<br />e round, 21 percent litter,l p eirennial
<br />erence area had 32 percent bar g 4 ercent p .
<br />ebgush ref bs 13 ercent perennial grasses, p ennal ? ? ? ? .
<br />Sag p ercent er
<br />sses trace of percent annual or ? es for a total of 31 p p
<br />percent annual gra ? and trace percent perennial tre
<br />nisi shrubs, en to statistical adequacy ?an? are
<br />forbs,l? percent paten ence area transacts were tak ; . ..
<br />etation. Note: The sagebrush re er Release.
<br />live veg ?e etation Report f or Bond .
<br />included in the 1999-200 g . , , ;, : , , :: , ., .. ? , . ? .
<br />Y
<br />':
<br />el 4°lQ -? 14?? ? 1810. ° ?' ?' ' `
<br />,Canopy cover is approximat y
<br />erennial grasses?? . ?? . ?.
<br />Waal asses, litter and p h . ,
<br />. ? d surf ace is comprised of an ? . ; . ? . ..
<br />Percent cover that contacts the groan
<br />is 2`Io ? 13 %n + 21 °la ? ?b°l0.
<br />This egos
<br />de between the "C" f actor f or ,zero ? ?? ? ..
<br />is 18 °l0, a simple interpolation is ma ; , . , ; , .
<br />Since the actual canopy cover
<br />to field an accurate "C" factor. .
<br />and that far ?5°?? canopy y ? , ..
<br />can , , ? _.
<br />opy ?? _-,
<br />. , ,, ? ? s?C?? for cano ?? 0-18
<br />. t?C? for cano 0-2? ? d . , ??
<br />.,.. d 18 .
<br />?5 . , .
<br />.., , ??, .
<br />,? ; .?. ,.: ,. ? , ? ? ? ? . ?._ .o?o57f
<br />. ?? ? ? 008 _? ? ? ? .
<br />. . , ? 0057 ? f?1oo57?
<br />. ?" . ? , : ; l ?' ;? " value is o:?10? -? .
<br />. Therefore, the best C
<br />.? ....
<br />e etation Sampling Area 1-A
<br />? g 3 percent annual
<br />t litter, 9 percent rock fragments, cent
<br />ercent bare ground, 10 percen
<br />8 ercent erennial forbs, and per
<br />This area had 3 p ercent erennial grasses,l p p .8 ercent noxious
<br />3 ercent annual forbs, 27 p p e etation. Block 1 also had ? p
<br />grasses, p otal of 3 ? percent perennial hve v g sad to reduce erosion.
<br />perennial shrubs for a t be counted in the overall cover u
<br />r restricted weeds. This will not
<br />andlo
<br />e etation Sampling Area 1-B
<br />? g ercent annual grasses,
<br />S ercent rock fragments, ? p ial
<br />cent bare ground, 9 percent litter, p nisi forbs, and ? percent perenn
<br />This area had 46 per ennui gasses, Z percent perm
<br />t annual forbs,l9 percent per g
<br />? percen
<br />?? ercent perennial live vegetation.
<br />shrubs for a total of p .
<br />ed as one unit, are given below:
<br />'fined areas, which are consider
<br />The average of the racial
|