Laserfiche WebLink
• A magnetic separation was performed at the University of Colorado on the dried and <br />sieved samples using a Franz Model L1 magnetic separator set at 1.5 amps ans a 20 <br />degree tilt. <br />2.2.3 Preparation of Grain Mounts <br />A 1 gram split of each dried and sieved sample was used to prepare epoxy grain <br />mounts. The procedure for preparing the mounts included pouring the sample into a 1- <br />inch diameter mold and covering with a thin layer of air-cured epoxy. The grains were <br />then blended with the epoxy using a disposable wood stirring rod and additional epoxy <br />was added. After curing at room temperature, the mount was ground flat, forming a <br />cross sectional cut through the grains. Polishing of the mount was performed using <br />successively finer grades of oil-based diamond paste. The final step in the preparation of <br />the grain mounts was to apply a thin carbon coating to the surface of the mount or <br />"puck" in order to allow proper conduction during microprobe analysis. <br />2.3 Operating Conditions <br />Operating conditions included a 15 KeV accelerating voltage, 17 NanoAmp cup current, <br />and a 1 to 2 micron beam size. Certified pure element standards were used to determine <br />phase compositions. Wavelength spectrometer crystals TAP for arsenic, PET for iron and <br />sulfur and LDE1 for oxygen were used for the WDS analyses. <br />2.4 Analytical Procedure <br />• Sample pucks were scanned for arsenic-containing minerals using backscattered electron <br />images. The scanning was done manually by systematically traversing from left to right <br />until the edge of the mount was reached. The puck was then moved up one field of view <br />and scanned from right to left. This process was repeated until the whole mount was <br />scanned. <br />Typically, the magnification used for scanning samples was 40-10OX and 300-600X, <br />depending on the individual sample's grain size distribution. The last setting allowed <br />the smallest identifiable (1 to 2 pm) phases to be found. Once a candidate particle was <br />identified, then the backscatter image was optimized to discriminate any different <br />phases within the particle or its association. Identification of the arsenic-bearing phases <br />was done using both energy-dispersive and wavelength-dispersive spectrometers set for <br />analyses of arsenic, sulfur, iron, and oxygen. <br />2.5 Samples Analyzed <br />A summary of the samples analyzed by EMP are summarized in Table 2-1. <br /> <br />6 <br />TA64986-Denison Mine Umic Order 3 - DMO Sampling and Analysis Plan\Task 3.12 - Soil, Oro, Rock Data Assessment Report\Bioavailability\DcnisonEMPTutO21709 (2).doc