My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-05-19_REVISION - M1981021 (32)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981021
>
2009-05-19_REVISION - M1981021 (32)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:18:37 PM
Creation date
5/27/2009 10:16:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981021
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/19/2009
Doc Name
EPP (AM-01) Attachment A: Transport; Att.B,1,2 Geochem. (part 2)
From
Denison Mines
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• A magnetic separation was performed at the University of Colorado on the dried and <br />sieved samples using a Franz Model L1 magnetic separator set at 1.5 amps ans a 20 <br />degree tilt. <br />2.2.3 Preparation of Grain Mounts <br />A 1 gram split of each dried and sieved sample was used to prepare epoxy grain <br />mounts. The procedure for preparing the mounts included pouring the sample into a 1- <br />inch diameter mold and covering with a thin layer of air-cured epoxy. The grains were <br />then blended with the epoxy using a disposable wood stirring rod and additional epoxy <br />was added. After curing at room temperature, the mount was ground flat, forming a <br />cross sectional cut through the grains. Polishing of the mount was performed using <br />successively finer grades of oil-based diamond paste. The final step in the preparation of <br />the grain mounts was to apply a thin carbon coating to the surface of the mount or <br />"puck" in order to allow proper conduction during microprobe analysis. <br />2.3 Operating Conditions <br />Operating conditions included a 15 KeV accelerating voltage, 17 NanoAmp cup current, <br />and a 1 to 2 micron beam size. Certified pure element standards were used to determine <br />phase compositions. Wavelength spectrometer crystals TAP for arsenic, PET for iron and <br />sulfur and LDE1 for oxygen were used for the WDS analyses. <br />2.4 Analytical Procedure <br />• Sample pucks were scanned for arsenic-containing minerals using backscattered electron <br />images. The scanning was done manually by systematically traversing from left to right <br />until the edge of the mount was reached. The puck was then moved up one field of view <br />and scanned from right to left. This process was repeated until the whole mount was <br />scanned. <br />Typically, the magnification used for scanning samples was 40-10OX and 300-600X, <br />depending on the individual sample's grain size distribution. The last setting allowed <br />the smallest identifiable (1 to 2 pm) phases to be found. Once a candidate particle was <br />identified, then the backscatter image was optimized to discriminate any different <br />phases within the particle or its association. Identification of the arsenic-bearing phases <br />was done using both energy-dispersive and wavelength-dispersive spectrometers set for <br />analyses of arsenic, sulfur, iron, and oxygen. <br />2.5 Samples Analyzed <br />A summary of the samples analyzed by EMP are summarized in Table 2-1. <br /> <br />6 <br />TA64986-Denison Mine Umic Order 3 - DMO Sampling and Analysis Plan\Task 3.12 - Soil, Oro, Rock Data Assessment Report\Bioavailability\DcnisonEMPTutO21709 (2).doc
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.