My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-05-19_REVISION - M1981021 (36)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981021
>
2009-05-19_REVISION - M1981021 (36)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:18:37 PM
Creation date
5/27/2009 9:22:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981021
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/19/2009
Doc Name
EPP amendment (AM-01) submittal (part 1)
From
Denison Mines
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 13 <br />Geochemical Data and Analysis <br />• dominant mechanisms controlling the volume of percolation through the <br />development rock areas. Minor differences in the physical characteristics and the <br />magnitude of annual precipitation are less important controls on the expected volume <br />of percolation. <br />The results of these estimates correspond to the input parameters including the <br />development rock physical and hydrologic parameters, and the available climate <br />data. Site-specific climate data are not available for the West Sunday and Topaz <br />mines, and differences between actual climate conditions at the site and the data <br />compiled from the Uravan and Montrose weather stations could result in variations in <br />percolation through the piles. There are other site-specific variations that are not <br />directly accounted for in the model. For example, a rind of highly compacted tight <br />soil/rock was encountered at the surface of the rock piles. This rind likely reduces <br />infiltration by allowing for increase runoff and increased surface evaporation via <br />ponding versus infiltration. This site-specific condition (which could further reduce <br />modeled percolation rates) was not accounted for in the model. <br />r1 <br />LJ <br />• <br />13-10 <br />7:164986-Denison MineslTask Order 4 - EPP Sunday Mines Group1FINAL EPPTINAL - Environmental Protection Plan Sunday Mines.doc
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.