My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-03-04_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2009-03-04_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:44:05 PM
Creation date
5/19/2009 10:09:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/4/2009
Doc Name
Walsh Report on Subsoil Suitability Feb 2008 (rev July 2008)
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05.4(2)(d) Attachment 2.05.4(2)(d)-1
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Footnote: Ed Baltzer was contacted regarding the estimation methodology of the coarse <br />fraction. He confirmed on June 4, 2008 that it is done visually and is done by volume and not <br />• by weight. This was the method employed for the samples studied in this report. Also, the <br />selenium threshold levels have been modified. See Table 2.04.9-2 in main text of Section <br />2.04.9. The conductivity limits have also been changed for subsoil in prime farmland from 4.0 <br />mmhos/cm to 6.0 mmhos/cm. <br />Resampling of Suitable Subsoil on Prime Farmland and Corresponding Results <br />As is seen from the lab results of 6/27/08, eight samples were re-run based on saturation paste <br />extract for conductivity in the placed subsoil in prime farmland prior to February 2008. Seven of <br />these samples were acceptable, as seen in the included lab sheet, page Attachment <br />2.05.4(2)(d)-1-14 . One sample, #32, still showed a high level of 7.33 mmhos/cm. Surrounding <br />samples were then taken according to the procedures outlined in Section 2.05.4(2)(d) of the <br />permit. The surrounding remediation test samples (4) around site #32 passed. See lab results <br />on page Attachment 2.05.4(20(d)-1-19&20. Since the surrounding test sites passes, no further <br />testing or action was needed for that site. There was some question about sample site #21 <br />being elevated, so four more remediation test samples were taken and those passed as well. <br />• As with Sample site #32, no further action is needed. See lab results on page Attachment <br />2.05.4(2)(d)-1-19&20. The results on the following pages all show acceptable results in the <br />surrounding area. <br />0 (Revised Nov 2008) Attachment 2.05.4(2)(d)-1-18
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.